Scholarship of Teaching and Learningun modelo de desarrollo profesional de los profesores universitarios
- Chocarro de Luis, Edurne 1
- Sobrino Morrás, Ángel 2
- González Torres, María Carmen 2
-
1
Universidad de La Rioja
info
-
2
Universidad de Navarra
info
ISSN: 1575-0965
Año de publicación: 2013
Título del ejemplar: Formación del profesorado en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior
Volumen: 16
Número: 1
Páginas: 5-14
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado: REIFOP
Resumen
En este artículo, examinamos el concepto de Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, su significado y evolución en la última década, ya que es un modelo de investigación y reflexión sobre la actividad docente. Los profesores universitarios, en su faceta investigadora, requieren hacer públicos sus resultados en artículos científicos como méritos académicos. En este sentido, este modelo reclama que los avances y mejoras en la docencia también sean divulgados y reconocido de igual modo. Es importante que la doble función del profesor en la Universidad, docente e investigador, goce del mismo valor para su promoción pero, sobre todo, que la enseñanza se evalúe en los mismo términos que la investigación y ello, en consecuencia, revierta en una mejora de su calidad.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Andresen, L.W. (2000). A usable, trans-disciplinary conception of scholarship. Higher Educational Research and Development,19(2), 137-153.
- Barr, R.B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From Teaching to Learning. A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.Change, 27(6), 13-25.
- Benjamin,J.(2000).The Scholar ship of Teaching in teams: what does it look like inpractice?Higher Education Research and Development ,19(2),191-204.
- Bolívar, A., & Caballero Rodríguez, K. (2008). Cómo hacer visible la excelencia en la enseñanza universitaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 46(8). Recuperado de http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/2276Bolivar.pdf
- Boyer, E.(1990).Scholar ship Reconsidered. Washington, DC:The Carnie Foundation.
- Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teachingand learning in highe reducation. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3-18.
- Brookfield,S.(2006).The skillfulteacher.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
- ChocarroDeLuis, E., González-Torres,M.C.,& SobrinoMorrás,A.(2011).Aprendizajey enseñanzaenel SigloXXI:pautas parael desarrolloprofesionaldelprofesorado.Pamplona: Ediciones Eunate.
- Cranton, P.(2011).ATransformativeperspectiveon theScholarship ofTeachingand Learning.Higher EducationResearchandDevelopment,30(1), 75-86.
- Crowe, A.R.,& Berry, A.(2007).Teaching perspective teachers about learning to think lik e ateacher: articulatingour principle sof practice. En T.Russell& J.Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. Values, relationships and practices (pp.31-44).NewYork: Routledge.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). (Eds.) Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Day,C. (2005). Formar docentes: cómo, cuándo y en qué condiciones aprende el profesorado. Madrid: Narcea.
- De La Cruz Tomé, M.A.(2003). Necesidad y objetivos de la formación pedagógica del profesor universitario. Revista de Educación, 331, 35-66.
- Feiman, N.S. (2001).From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teacher College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
- Greenhow, C., Robeline, B., & Hughes, J.E. (2009). Learning, Teaching and Scholarship in a Digital Age. Educationa Research, 38 (1), 246-259.
- Healey, M. (2000). Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education: a discipline basedapproach. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 169-189.
- Kane, R. (2002). How we teach the teachers: new ways to theorize practice and practise theory. Prospect, 32(3), 347.
- Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasining reflective practice. Higher Education, 47, 283-310.
- Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S., & Hay, D. B. (2008). Universities as centres of non-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 89-103.
- Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 11(1), 47-71.
- Korthagen, F., & Verkuyl, H. (2007). Do you encounter your student or yourself? The search for inspiration as an essential component of teacher education. En T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. Values, relationship and practices (pp. 106- 123). New York: Routledge.
- Kreber, C. (2000). How university teaching award winners conceptualise academic work: Some further thoughts on the meaning of scholarship. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 61-78.
- Kreber, C. (2002). Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 151-167.
- Kreber, C. (2003). The scholarship of teaching: a comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff. Higher Education, 46(1), 93-121.
- Kreber, C. (2005). Reflection on teaching and the Scholarship of teaching: focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50(2), 523-359.
- Kreber, C. (2007). What's it really all about? The scholarship of teaching and learning as an authentic practice. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1).
- Kreber, C. (2013). The transformative potencial of Scholarshipo of Teaching. Teaching and Learning Inquery, 1 (1), 5-18.
- Kreber, C. & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of Teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476-495.
- Little, J.W. (2003). Inside teacher community. Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945.
- Loughran, J. (2007). Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. En T. Russell y J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. Values, relationships and practices, (pp. 1-16). New York: Routledge,.
- Loughran, J., Hamilton, Laboskey, V., & Rusell, T. (2002). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Loughran, J., & Rusell, T. (2002). Improving teacher education self-study. New York: Routledge.
- Lueddeke, G. (2003). Proffesionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and teaching-scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213-228.
- Martin, E., & Ransden, P. (2000). Introduction. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 133- 135.
- Mccombs, B. (2003). Defining tools for teacher reflection: The Assessment of Learner-Centered Practices (ALCP). Comunicación presentada en Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
- Monereo, C. (1998). Estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Barcelona: Graó. Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1825-1853.
- Salomon, G. (1992). The changing role of the teacher: from information transmitter to orchestrator of learning. En K. Oser, A. Dick & J.L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching (pp. 35- 49). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
- Shulman, L.S. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48-53.
- Shulman, L.S., & Shulman, J. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.
- Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 155-168,
- Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the Scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 523-536.
- Vardi, I., & Quin, R. (2011). Promotin and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 30 (1), 39-49.