El papel de las tareas y los procesos en los resultados grupalesdiferencias entre México y España

  1. Osca Segovia, Amparo
  2. Urién Angulo, M. Begoña
  3. Rodrigo Iriarte, María José
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728 1695-2294

Ano de publicación: 2012

Volume: 28

Número: 3

Páxinas: 915-921

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.28.3.156151 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Anales de psicología

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso, E., Osca, A. y Palací, F. (1996). El patrón ideal de la cultura organizacional. Revista de Psicología Social, 11(1), 33-46.
  • Aykan, Z. y Kanungo, R.N. (2001). Crosscultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Critical Appraisal of the Field and the Future Directions. En N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil y Ch. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 385-408). London: Sage Publications.
  • Bochner, S. y Hesketh, B.(1994). Power distance, individualism/collectivism, & job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 233-257.
  • Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J. y Higgs, A. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implicacions for designing effectiveness group. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
  • Cox, T.H., Lobel, S.A. y McLeod, P.L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827-847.
  • Drenth, P.J.D. y Groenendijk, B. (1998) Organizational Psychology in a Cross Cultural Perspective. En P.J.D. Drenth, H. Thierry y C.J. de Wolf (Eds.), Organizational Psychology (pp. 133-154). East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.
  • Earley, P.C. y Gibson, C.B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24(3), 265-304.
  • Earley, P.C. y Mosakowski, E. (1994). Experimental Internal Management Research. En B.J. Punnett y O. Shenkar (Eds.), Handbook of International Management Research (pp. 83-114). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Erez, M. y Somech, A. (1996). Is group productivity loss the rule or the exception? Effects of culture and group-based motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1513-1537.
  • Eylon, D. y Au, K.Y. (1999). Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences along the power distance dimension. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(3), 373-385.
  • Fleishman, E.A. y Zaccaro, S.J. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. En R.W. Swezey, y E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 31-56). Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing.
  • Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups in context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
  • Guarino, L. y Feldman, L. (2005). La diferencia de la sensibilidad emocional entre británicos y venezolanos. Psicothema, 17(4), 639-644.
  • Guzzo, R.A. y Shea, G.P. (1992). Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations. En M.D. Dunette y L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organization Psychology (pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
  • Hackman, J. R. y Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A metaanalytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332-1356.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constrains in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81-94.
  • Huang, X. y Van de Vliert, E (2003). Comparing work behaviors across cultures: A cross-level approach using multilevel modelling. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3 (2), 167-182.
  • Hyatt, D.E. y Ruddy, Th.M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 553-585.
  • Ilgen, D.R., Mayor, D.A., Hollenbeck, J.R. y Sego, D.J. (1993). Team Research in the 1990s. En M.M Chemers y R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership Theory and Research. Perspectives and Directions. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Kilmann, R.H. y Saxton, M.J. (1983). The Kilmann-Saxton Cultura-Gap Survey. Pittsburg, PA.: Organizational Design Consultans.s
  • Kirkman, B.L. y Shapiro, D.L. (1997). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing wok teams: the mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 557-569.
  • Kirkman, B.L. y Shapiro, D.L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing wok teams: the mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 557-569.
  • Klein, H. A., y Steele-Johnson, D. (2007). Training for multinational teamwork. In R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 473-506). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Li, F., Li, Y. y Wang, E (2009). Task characteristics and team performance: the mediating effect of team member satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(10), 1373-1382.
  • Musitu, G. y García, J.F. (2004). Consecuencias de la socialización familiar en la cultura española. Psicothema, 16(2), 288-293.
  • Newman, K.L. y Nollen, S.D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 753-779.
  • Nicholls, C.E., Lane, H.W., Brechu, M.B. (1999) Taking self-managed teams to Mexico. Academy of Management Executive, 13(3), 15-27.
  • Pavett, C. y Morris, T. (1995). Management styles within a multinational corporation: A five country comparative study. Human Relations, 48(10), 1171-1191.
  • Pelled, L. y Xin, K. (1997). Work values and their human resource management implications: A theoretical comparison of China, Mexico and the United States. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 6, 185-198.
  • Robert, C., Probst, T.M., Martocchio, J.J., Drasgow, F. y Lawler, J.L (2000). Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 643-658.
  • Ruiz, R., Sánchez, V. y Menesini, E. (2002). Violencia entre iguales y desconexión moral: un análisis transcultural. Psicothema, 14(Supl), 37-49.
  • Salas, E., Diaz, D., Klein, C., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008). Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 50, 903-933.
  • Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications: Theorical advances and empirical tests in twenty countries. En M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1-65). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Shaw, J.D., Duffy, M.K. y Stark, E.M. (2000). Interdependence and preference for work group: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and the performance of group members. Journal of Management, 26(2), 259-279.
  • Smith, P.B., Dugan, S., Peterson, M.F. y Leung, K. (1998). Individualism: Collectivism and the handling of disagreement. A 23 country study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(3), 351-367.
  • Spector, P.E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.
  • Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29-55.
  • Strauch, B. (2010). Can Cultural Differences Lead to Accidents? Team Cultural Differences and Sociotechnical System Operations. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52, 245-263.
  • Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E. y Cannon-Bowers, (1996). Promoting Team Effectiveness. En M.A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Londres: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Tschan, F. y Von Cranach, M. (1996). Group Task Structure, Processes and Outcomes. M.A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Londres: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Urien, B. (2001). Los grupos de trabajo y la efectividad grupal: un estudio en el sector de la automoción. Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid.
  • Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Kompier, M. A. J., y Doorewaard, H. A. (2005). Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being: Review of a multilevel research domain. Group and Organization Management, 30(2), 211-235.