Patrones de transferencia de tecnología entre empresas matrices, filiales y rivalessu efecto sobre la competencia
- Mendi Güemes, Pedro
- Moner Colonques, Rafael
- Sempere Monerris, José Jorge
ISSN: 0422-2784
Year of publication: 2011
Issue Title: Fuentes y efectos económicos de la innovación
Issue: 382
Pages: 93-100
Type: Article
More publications in: Economía industrial
Abstract
This paper provides a quantitative view of the international market for technology, in which most of the transfers happen within multinational firms by means of royalty based contracts. We develop a competition model where one of the firms, partially owned by a multinational firm that holds a process innovation, has been transferred the technology. When the affiliated firm is the most efficient one in the market, a higher share implies the rival of the affiliated firm paying positive and greater royalties in more cases and so the multinational can control the intensity of competition
Bibliographic References
- ANAND, B. N.; KHANNA, T. (2000): «The structure of licensing contracts». Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 48, nº 1, pp. 103- 135.
- ARORA, A.; FOSFURI, A. (2003): «Licensing the market for technology». Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 52, pp. 277-295.
- ARROW, K.J. (1962): «Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention» en R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (2010): Survey of Current Business.
- CABALLERO-SANZ, F.; MONER-COLONQUES, R.; SEMPEREMONERRIS, J.J. (2002): «Optimal licensing in a spatial model». Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, vol. 66, pp. 257-279.
- CABALLERO-SANZ, F.; MONER-COLONQUES, R.; SEMPEREMONERRIS, J.J. (2005): «Licensing policies for a new product». Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 14, nº 8, pp. 697-713.
- CEBRIÁN, M. (2009): «The structure of payments as a way to alleviate contractual hazards in international technology licensing». Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18, nº 6, pp. 1135-1160.
- GALLINI, N. (1984): «Deterrence by market sharing: a strategic incentive for licensing», American Economic Review, vol. 74, nº 5, pp. 931-941.
- GANS J.S.; STERN, S. (2000):«Incumbency and R&D incentives: licensing the gale of creative destruction». Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 9, nº 4, pp. 485-511.
- HALL, R.; JONES, C., (1999): «Why do some countries produce so much more output than others?». Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, nº 1, pp. 83-116.
- JAVORCIK, B.S.; SPATAREANU, M. (2008): «To share or not to share: Does local participation matter for spillovers from foreign direct investment?». Journal of Development Economics, vol. 85, pp. 194-217.
- KAMIEN M.; TAUMAN Y. (1986): «Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent». Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, nº 3, pp. 471-491.
- KAMIEN M.; TAUMAN Y. (2002): «Optimal licensing: the inside story». The Manchester School, vol. 70, nº 1, pp. 7-15.
- KAMIEN M.; TAUMAN Y.; ZANG I. (1988): «Optimal license fees for a new product», Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 16, nº 1, pp. 77- 106.
- KAMIEN M.; OREN S.; TAUMAN Y. (1992): «Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation», Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 21, nº 5, pp. 483-508.
- KAMIEN, M., (1992): “Patent licensing”, en Aumann, R. y Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam.
- KATZ M.; SHAPIRO C. (1986): «How to license intangible property». Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, nº 3, pp. 567- 589.
- KIM Y.; VONORTAS N. S. (2006): «Determinants of technology licensing: the sase of licensors». Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 27, pp. 235-249.
- MACHO-STADLER, I.; MARTÍNEZ-GIRALT, X.; PÉREZ-CASTRILLO, D. (1996): «The role of information sharing in licensing contract design». Research Policy, vol. 25, pp. 43-57.
- MARKUSEN, J. (2002): Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- MATTOOA, A; OLARREAGA, M.; SAGGI, K. (2004): «Mode of foreign entry, technology transfer, and FDI policy». Journal of Development Economics, vol. 75, pp. 95-111.
- MCGEE J. S. (1966): «Patent exploitation: some economic and legal problems». Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 9, pp. 135-162.
- MENDI, P. (2005): «The structure of payments in technology transfer contracts: evidence from Spain». Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 14, nº 2, pp. 403-429.
- MENDI, P. (2007): «Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries». Research Policy, vol. 36, 121-133.
- MUTO, S. (1993): «On licensing policies in Bertrand competition». Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 5, pp. 257-267.
- OCDE (2009): Main Science and Technology Statistics. OCDE, París.
- PÉREZ, S. (1996): «Metodología para el estudio de los procesos de transferencia de tecnología: aplicación al caso español». Tesis doctoral, ETSII, UNED.
- PÉREZ-CASTRILLO, D. (1993): «Contratos de licencias de patentes». Revista Española de Economía, Monográfico de I+D, pp. 109-126.
- ROCKETT, K.E. (1990): «Choosing the competition and patent licensing».Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 21, nº 1, pp. 161-171.
- SAGGI, K., (1999): «Foreign direct investment, licensing, and incentives for innovation».Review of International Economics, vol. 7, pp. 699- 714.
- SCOTCHMER, S. (2005): Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
- SEN, D.; TAUMAN, Y. (2007): «General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation». Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 59, pp. 163-186.
- SOHN, S. J. (2006): «Choosing the partners in the licensing alliance». Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 27, pp. 251-260.
- VISHWASRAO, S. (2007): «Royalties vs. fees: how do firms pay for foreign technology?». International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 25, nº 4, pp. 741-759.
- WANG, X. H., (1998): «Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model». Economics Letters, vol. 60, nº 1, pp. 55-62.
- YI, S.-S., (1998): «Whom to license patented technology». Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 19, pp. 189-195.