Comprensión de metáforas y su relación con la comprensión lectora y el rendimiento escolar

  1. Ripoll Salceda, J. C.
  2. Aguado Alonso, Gerardo
Revista:
Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

ISSN: 0214-4603

Año de publicación: 2007

Volumen: 27

Número: 2

Páginas: 56-66

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/S0214-4603(07)70074-8 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, C., Baxendale, J., Lloyd, J. y Aldred, C. (2005). Pragmatic language impairment: case studies of social and pragmatic language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(3), 227-250.
  • Araya, C. A., de la Calle, A. M., de la Calle, L., y García, M. (2005). Lengua. Primaria curso 3. Zaragoza: Edelvives.
  • Blasko, D. G. y Briihls, D. S. (1997). Reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 261-285.
  • Català, G., Català, M., Molina, E. y Monclús, R. (2001). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Pruebas ACL Barcelona: Graó.
  • Cameron, L. (1996). Discourse context and the development of metaphor in children. Current Issues in Language & Society, 3(1), 49-64.
  • Cometa, M. S. y Eson, M. E. (1978). Logical operations and metaphor interpretation: a Piagetian model. Child Development, 49, 649-659.
  • Colston, H. L. y Kuiper, M. S. (2002). Figurative language development research and popular chidren's literature: why we should know, "where the wild things are". Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 27-43.
  • De Bustos, E. (2000). La metáfora. Ensayos transdisciplinares. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica-UNED.
  • Equipo Mural (2005). Matemáticas. Primaria curso 3. Zaragoza: Edelvives.
  • Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping. The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47-59.
  • Gentner, D. y Wolff, P. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 331-355.
  • Giora, R. y Fein, O. (1999). On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 83-101.
  • Gong, S. P. y Ahrens, K. (2004). Congruent and incongruent metaphorical sentences processing in discourse: a reaction time study. En S.-F. Huang (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (pp. 367-382). Taipei: Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University.
  • Happé, F. (1995). Understanding Minds and Metaphors: Insights from the Study of Figurative Language in Autism. Metaphor and symbolic activity 10(4), 275-295.
  • Helstrup, T. (1988). The influence of verbal and imagery strategies on processing figurative language. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 65-84.
  • Helstrup, T. (1995). Strategies or similarities - what determines mastery of figurative language? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 36, 65-81.
  • Highnam, C., Wegmann, J. y Woods, J. (1999). Visual and verbal metaphors among children with typical language and language disorders. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 32, 25-35.
  • Jiménez, M. C., Hernández, C. y Celeiro, A. (2005). Conocimiento del Medio. Primaria curso 3. Zaragoza: Edelvives.
  • Johnson, J. (1989). Factors related to cross-language transfer and metaphor interpretation in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 157-177.
  • Johnson, J. y Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). Developmental levels of processing in metaphor interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 1-31.
  • Kazmerski, V. A., Blasko, D. G. y Dessalegn, B. G. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 31(5), 673-689.
  • Kogan, N. y Chadrow, M. (1986). Chidren's comprehension of metaphor in the pictorial and verbal modality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 285-295.
  • Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1986). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Lakoff, G. y Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodiend Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Nueva York: Basic Books.
  • Levorato, M.C. y Cacciari, C. (2002). The creation of new figurative expressions: psycholinguistic evidence in Italian children, adolescents and adults. Journal of Child Language, 29, 127-150.
  • Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B. y Cacciari, C. (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study. Brain and Language, 91, 303-314.
  • Nippold, M. y Fey, S. H. (1983). Metaphoric understanding in preadolescents having a history of language acquisition difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 171-180.
  • Nippold, M., Leonard, L. B. y Kail, R. (1984). Syntactic and conceptual factors in children's understanding of metaphors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 197-205.
  • Qualls, C. D., y Harris, J. L. (2003). Age, working memory, figurative language type, and reading ability: Influencing factors in African American adults' comprehension of figurative language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 92-102.
  • Reynolds, R. E. y Ortony, A. (1980). Some issues in the measurement of children's comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development, 51, 1110-1119.
  • Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E. y Wilson, P. T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child's understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development, 55, 1588-1606.
  • Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Winner, E. y Gardner, H. (1993). Metaphor and irony. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2.a ed. pp. 425-443). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K. y Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12(4), 289-297.