Proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje y web 2.0valoración del conectivismo como teoría de aprendizaje post-constructivismo

Referencias bibliográficas

• APA (1993). Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: Guidelines for School Redesign and Reform. Washington: American Psychological Association. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/ contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED371994
• Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Barnes, C. y Tynan, B. (2007). The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. Research in Learning Technology, 15(3), 189200.
• Barrón, A. (1991). Aprendizaje por descubrimiento: análisis crítico y reconstrucción teórica. Salamanca: Amarú Ediciones.
• Beeman, W. O. et al. (1987). Hypertext and pluralism: from lineal to non-lineal thinking. En J. B. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 87 Conference (pp. 6788). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
• Bennett, S.; Maton, K. y Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
• Brown, J. S. (1988). Steps toward a new epistemology of situated learning. Proceedings of the ITS-88: International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Montreal: University of Montreal.
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A. y Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-45.
• Brown, T. H. (2006). Beyond constructivism: navigationism in the knowledge era. On the Horizon, 14(3), 108-120.
• Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101-108.
• Cabero, J. y Llorente, M.C. (2010). Comunidades virtuales para el aprendizaje. EDUTEC: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 34, 1-10. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://edutec.rediris.es /revelec2/revelec34/
• Cabero, J. (2006). Comunidades virtuales para el aprendizaje. Su utilización en la enseñanza. EDUTEC: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 20, 1-34. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/revelec34/comunidades_ virtuales_aprendizaje.html
• Castaño, C., Maíz, I. y Palacio, G. J. (2008) Prácticas educativas en entornos web 2.0. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Chocarro, E., González-Torres, M.C. y Sobrino, A. (2007). Nuevas orientaciones en la formación del profesorado para una enseñanza centrada en la promoción del aprendizaje autorregulado. Estudios sobre Educación, 12, 81-98.
• Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-449.
• Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext, an introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.
• Cruz, R. E., Lara, S. y Naval, C. (2010). Conceptos y aplicaciones de la web 2.0. En C. Naval, S. Lara, C. Ugarte, Ch. Sádaba (Eds.), Educar para la comunicación y la cooperación social (pp. 139-150). Pamplona: Consejo Audiovisual de Navarra.
• Dabbagh, N. (2006). Instructional Design Knowledge Base. Nada Dabbagh’s Homepage, George Mason University, Instructional Technology Program. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://classweb.gmu.edu/ndabbagh/Resources/ IDKB/index.htm
• Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical Perspectives Influencing the Use of Information Technology in Teaching and Learning. En J. Voogt y G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 43-62). New York: Springer.
• Dempsey, J. V. y Van Eck R. N (2007). Distributed Learning and the Field of Instructional Design. En R. A Reiser y J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. (pp. 288-300). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
• Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C. y Lindström, B. (Eds.) (2009). Analysing Networked Learning Practices in Higher Education and Continuing Professional Development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Driscoll. M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. New York: Allin & Bacon. Downes (2007). What Connectivism is. Half an hour. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
• Edson, J. (2007). Curriculum 2.0: User-driven education. The Huffington Post. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ jonathan-edson/curriculum-20-userdri_b_53690.html
• Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V. y McConnell, D. (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Gros, B. (2008). Las comunidades virtuales para la formación permanente del profesorado. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació (REIRE), 1, 1-10. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.raco.cat/index.php/REIRE/article/ view/121049/166924
• Katz, I. R. y Macklin, A. S. (2007). Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy: Integration and assessment in higher education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4), 50-55.
• Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K. y Chang, R.L. (2008). Immigrants and Natives: Investigating differences between staff and students‘ use of technology. En R. Atkinson y C. McBeath (Eds), Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of the 25th ASCILITE Conference (pp. 641–652). Melbourne. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/kennedy.pdf
• Kop, R. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies: Disruptive or liberating for adult education? Gateway to the Future of Learning. Proceedings 49th Adult Education Research Conference (pp. 222-227). St. Louis: University of Missouri.
• Kop, R. y Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/ irrodl/article/ view/523
• Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching. A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
• Li, Q., Clark, B. y Winchester, I. (2010). Instructional design and technology grounded in enactivism: A paradigm shift? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 403–419.
• Lorenzo, G. y Dziuban, C. D. (2006). Ensuring the Net Generation is Net Savvy. www.educause.edu/netgenerationlearners. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3006.pdf
• Markle, S. M. (1992). Unchaining the slaves: discovery learning is not being told. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 222-227.
• Martínez Delgado, A. (1998). No todos somos constructivistas. Revista de Educación, 315, 179-178
• McLoughlin, C., Lee, M.J.W. y Chan, A. (2006). Using student generated podcasts to foster reflection and metacognition. Australian Educational Computing, 21(2), 34-40.
• McLoughlin, C. y Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: extending pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. En R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th ASCILITE Conference (pp. 664–675). Singapore. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.ascilite.org.au/ conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
• McLoughlin, C. y Lee, M.J.W. (2008). Mapping the digital terrain: new media and social software as catalysts for pedagogical change. En R. Atkinson y C. McBeath (Eds), Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of the 25th ASCILITE Conference (pp. 641–652). Melbourne. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
• McLoughlin, C. y Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/ mcloughlin.html
• Mylläri, J., Åhlberg, M. y Dillon, P. (2010). The dynamics of an online knowledge building community: A 5-year longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 365–387.
• Njenga, J. K. & Fourie, L. C. H. (2010). The myths about e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 199-212.
• Nubiola, J. (2001). Pragmatismo y relativismo: una defensa del pluralismo. Themata. Revista de Filosofía, 27, 49-57.
• O’Reilly, T. (2007). What Is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies, 65(1), 17-37. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4580/ 1/MPRA_paper_4580.pdf
• Pascual, B. (2005). Una aproximación conexionista a los procesos mentales: entrevista con James L. McClelland. Anuario Filosófico, 30(3), 841-855.
• Paris, S. G. y Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
• Pozo, J. I. (2008). Aprendices y maestros. Madrid: Alianza.
• Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional Design: What is it and why is it? En C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their Current Status. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Ryberg, T. y Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2008). Power Users and patchworking – An analytical approach to critical studies of young people’s learning with digital media. Educational Media International, 45(3), 143–156.
• Romiszowski, A. J. (1990). The Hypertext/Hypermedia Solution. But What Exactly is the Problem? En D. H. Jonassen y H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing Hypermedia for Learning (pp. 321-354). Berlín: Springer.
• Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Elearnspace. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.elearnspace.org/ Articles/connectivism.htm
• Siemens, G. (2006a). Knowing Knowledge. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
• Siemens, G. (2006b). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime of the self-amused? Elearnspace. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.elearnspace.org/ Articles/ connectivism_self-amused.htm
• Siemens, G. (2008). What is the unique idea in Connectivism? Connectivism. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=116
• Siemens, G. (2009). Struggling for a metaphor for change. Connectivism. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.connectivism.ca/?cat=7
• Siemens, G. (2010a). Teaching in Social and Technological Networks. Connectivism. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=220
• Siemens, G. (2010b). Thought experiment on social networked learning. Connectivism. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=297
• Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
• Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969-977.
• Solomon, G. (1988). AI in reverse: Computer Tools that Turn Cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 123-139.
• Smith, S. D. y Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2010. Boulder: ECAR. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.educause.edu/ecar
• Streibel, M. J. (1989). Diseño instructivo y aprendizaje situado: ¿es posible un maridaje? Revista de Educación, 289, 215-234.
• Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A. y Clark, R. E. (2007). Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121.
• Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511.
• Verhagen, P. (2006). Connectivism: A new learning theory? Surf e-learning themasite. Extraído el 30 de diciembre de 2010 de http://www.surfspace.nl/nl/Redactieomgeving/Publicaties/Documents/Connectivism%20a%20new%20theory.pdf
• Wagner, E. D. (1994) In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(20), 6-29.
• Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practices. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
• Weimer, M. (2002). Learned-centered teaching: Five keys changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Wagner, E. D. (1997) Interactivity: From agents to outcome En T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver and evaluate programs (pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: The Guilford Press.