Identity and conflicts in the ethics of neural implants

  1. Luis Enrique Echarte
  2. Miguel García Valdecasas
Journal:
Cuadernos de bioética

ISSN: 1132-1989 2386-3773

Year of publication: 2014

Issue Title: Posthumano, más que humano

Volume: 25

Issue: 85

Pages: 415-426

Type: Article

More publications in: Cuadernos de bioética

Abstract

The development of neuroprosthetics has given rise to significant theoretical and practical challenges concerning personal identity. The Extended Mind Theory (EMT) attempts to provide an answer to these challenges by arguing that the mind and the external world are co-extensive to the point that both can make a seamless unified entity. The EMT also proposes that physical states determine the nature of mental states. Here, we propose a non-deterministic and less locationist view of mental states that we will call iEMT. The iEMT articulates, firstly, that the co-extensivity of the mind and the world does not justify the dissolution of the mind in the objects of the external world with which the mind interacts. Consequently, the agent’s mind is still part of his unique personal identity. Secondly, neural implants cannot be regarded as mere replacement parts in the context of a weak concept of personal identity. Thirdly, there are no com - pelling reasons to believe or to fear that neuroprosthetics can alter personal identity at the profound level

Bibliographic References

  • Bennett, M.R., Hacker, P.M.S. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
  • Cash, M. «Extended cognition, personal responsibility, and relational autonomy». Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4), (2010), 645-671.
  • Clark, A. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence, New York, Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Clark, A, Chalmers D. «The extended mind». Analysis 58(1), (1998), 7-19.
  • Halpern, C.H., Rick, J.H., Danish, S.F., Grossman, M., Baltuch, G.H. «Cognition following bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson’s disease». Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 24, (2009), 443-51.
  • Hayles, K. «Wrestling with transhumanism». In Hansell, G., Grassie, W. (eds), Transhumanism and its critics, Philadelphia, Metanexus Institute, 2011.
  • House, R.M. Thompson, T.L. «Psychiatric aspects of Organ Transplantation». JAMA 260(4), (1998), 535-539.
  • Jackson, F., «What Mary didn’t know». Philosophical Quarterly 32, (1986), 127-136.
  • Levy, N. What Makes Us Moral: Crossing the boundaries of Biology, Oxford, One World Publication, 2004.
  • Locke, J. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, vol. 1, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1894.
  • Locke, J. An essay concerning human understanding, New York, Dover, 1959.
  • Nagel, T. The view from nowhere, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • Parfit, D. Reasons and Persons, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984.
  • Polanyi, M. «Life’s irreducible structure». Science 160(3834), (1968), 1308-1312.
  • Richardson, I. «Mobile technosoma: Some phenomenological reflections in itinerant media devices». The Fibreculture Journal, (2005), 6.
  • Schüpbach, M., Agid, Y. «Psychosocial adjustment after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease». Nature Reviews Neurology 4, (2008), 4: 58-59.