Validez diagnóstica del índice de resistividad en pacientes trasplantados renales con disfunción del injertocorrelación histológica

  1. Paula García Barquín 1
  2. Jon Etxano Cantera 1
  3. Maite Millor Muruzabal 1
  4. Hernán Darío Quiceno Arias 1
  5. David Cano Dafart 1
  6. Alberto Benito Boillos 1
  1. 1 Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
    info

    Clínica Universitaria de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03phm3r45

Revue:
Diálisis y trasplante: publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Diálisis y Trasplante

ISSN: 1886-2845

Année de publication: 2015

Volumen: 36

Número: 1

Pages: 15-19

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.DIALIS.2014.10.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Diálisis y trasplante: publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Diálisis y Trasplante

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Objective To estimate the diagnostic validity of the resistance index (RI) in renal transplant patients with graft dysfunction, using the histopathological findings as gold standard. Material and methods A retrospective review was performed on the biopsies of 85 patients with renal graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the histological findings: normal findings, acute rejection, chronic rejection, and other findings. The RI was assessed by Doppler ultrasound, considering values of < .55 and > .75 as pathological, and were analyzed along with the findings in the biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of RI were assessed. The mean RI was compared between patients with normal and abnormal pathological findings. Results The RI was normal in 59 patients, and pathological in 26. The RI showed a specificity of 72.73% and a high positive predictive value of 88.46% in patients with graft dysfunction. There was no statistically significant difference (P = .196) in the RI between patients with normal and pathological histopathology in the biopsy. Conclusion Despite its low sensitivity, the RI is reliable in detecting an abnormal parameter when its value is outside the reference range. However the performing a biopsy is still required to determine the cause of the kidney disease.