The simple view of reading in elementary schoola systematic review

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aaron P.G., Joshi R.M., Gooden R., Bentum K.E. Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading an alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2008, 41(1):67-84.
• Adlof S.M., Catts H.W., Little T.D. Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component?. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2006, 19(9):933-958.
• Handbook of reading research 1991, vol. 2. White Plains, NY, Longman.
• Braze D., Tabor W., Shankweiler D.P., Mencl W.E. Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2007, 40(3):226-243.
• Byrne B., Fielding-Barnsley R. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology 1995, 87(3):488-503.
• Cain K., Oakhill J., Bryant P. Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal 2000, 13:31-56.
• Cain K., Oakhill J., Bryant P. Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004, 96(1):31-42.
• Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language. A cognitive perspective 2007, Guilford Press, New York. K. Cain, J. Oakhill (Eds.).
• Cartwright K.B. Cognitive development and reading: The relation of reading-specific multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 94(1):56-63.
• Cartwright K.B. The contribution of graphophonological-semantic flexibility to reading comprehension in college students: Implications for a less simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research 2007, 39:173-193.
• Carver R.P. Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1998, 10(2):121-154.
• Carver R.P., David A.H. Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading 2001, 5(2):107-140.
• Catts H.W., Adlof S.M., Weismer S.E. Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2006, 49(2):278-293.
• Chen R.S., Vellutino F.R. Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research 1997, 29(1):1-24.
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1969, Academic Press, New York.
• Collins W.M., Levy B.A. Developing fluent text processing with practice: Memorial influences on fluency and comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 2008, 49(2):133-139.
• Concannon-Gibney T., Murphy B. Reading practice in Irish primary classrooms: Too simple a view of reading?. Literacy 2010, 44(3):122-130.
• Conners F.A. Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2009, 22(5):591-613.
• Curtis M.E. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1980, 72(5):656-669.
• Cutting L.E., Scarborough H.S. Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading 2006, 10(3):277-299.
• Davis M. Reading instruction: The two keys 2006, Core Knowledge Foundation, Charlottesville, VA.
• Department for Education The Framework for the National Curriculum. A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review 2011, Department for Education, London.
• Department of Education The new conceptual framework for teaching reading: the 'simple view of reading' 2010, Retrieved from http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/20162.
• Dreyer L.G., Katz L. An examination of "the simple view of reading". Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives. Forty-first yearbook of the national reading conference 1992, 169-175. National Reading Conference, Inc., Chicago. C.K. Kinzer, D.J. Leu (Eds.).
• Florit E., Cain K. The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies?. Educational Psychology Review 2011, 23:553-576.
• Georgieu G.K., Das J.P., Hayward D. Revisiting the "simple view of reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2009, 42(1):76-84.
• Handbook of psycholinguistics 1994, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
• Goff D.A., Pratt C., Ong B. The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing 2005, 18:583-616.
• Gough P.B., Hoover W.A., Peterson C.L. Some observations on a simple view of reading. Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. 1996, 1-13. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. C. Cornoldi, J. Oakhill (Eds.).
• Harrison C. Why do policy-makers find the "simple view of reading" so attractive, and why do I find it so morally repugnant?. Interdisciplinary perspectives on learning to read 2010, Routledge, New York. K. Hall, U. Goswami, C. Harrison, S. Ellis, J. Soler (Eds.).
• Høien-Tengesdal I. Is the simple view of reading too simple?. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2010, 54(5):451-469.
• Hoover W.A., Gough P.B. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1990, 2(2):127-160.
• Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L. Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
• Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L., Jackson G.B. Meta-analysis 1982, Beberly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Johnson B.T., Eagly A. Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000, 496-528. Cambridge University Press, London. H.T. Reis, C.M. Judd (Eds.).
• Johnston T.C., Kirby J.R. The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2006, 19(4):339-361.
• Joshi R.M., Aaron P.G. The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology 2000, 21(2):85-97.
• Handbook of reading research 2000, vol. 3. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
• Keenan J.M., Betjemann R.S., Olson R.K. Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 2008, 12:281-300.
• Kendeou P., Van Den Broek P., White M.J., Lynch J.S. Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(4):765-778.
• Kershaw S., Schatschneider C. A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing 2012, 25:433-464.
• Kim Y.S., Pallante D. Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first graders in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2012, 25:1-25.
• Kirby J.R., Savage R.S. Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading?. Literacy 2008, 42(2):75-82.
• LaBerge D., Samuels J. Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:293-323.
• Lee L.W., Wheldall K. An examination of the simple view of reading among beginning readers in Malay. Reading Psychology 2009, 30:250-264.
• Megherbi H., Seigneuric A., Ehrlich M.F. Reading comprehension in French 1st and 2nd grade children: Contribution of decoding and language comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education 2006, 21(2):135-147.
• Ministère Éducation Nationale Enseignement Supérieur Recherche Apprendre à lire 2006, Direcion de l'Enseignement Scolaire, Paris.
• Neale M.D. Neale analysis of reading ability: Manual 2006, ACER Press, Melbourne.
• Neuhaus G., Roldan L.W., Boulware-Gooden R., Swank P.R. Parsimonious reading models: Identifying teachable subskills. Reading Psychology 2006, 27:37-58.
• Nusca V.M. The role of domain-specific knowledge in the reading comprehension of adult readers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2000, 61(6-B):3302.
• Observatoire National de la Lecture Apprendre à lire 1998, Éditions Odile Jacob, Paris.
• Observatoire National de la Lecture L'Enseignement de la lecture et l'observation des manuels de lecture du CP 2007, Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale, de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Paris.
• Ouellette G., Beers A. A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing 2009, 23(2):189-208.
• Handbook of reading research 1984, vol. 1. Longman, White Plains, NY.
• Pressley M., Duke N.K., Fingeret L., Park Y., Reffitt K., Mohan L., et al. Working with struggling readers: Why we must get beyond the simple view of reading and visions of how it might be done. The handbook of school psychology 2008, 522-546. Wiley, New York. 4th ed. T.B. Gutkin, C.R. Reynolds (Eds.).
• Ripoll, J. C. (2010). La concepción simple de la lectura en educación primaria: una revisión sistemática [The simple view of reading in elementary school: A systematic review]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Spain: University of Navarre.
• Roch M., Levorato M.C. Simple view of reading in Down's syndrome: The role of listening comprehension and reading skills. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2009, 44(2):206-223.
• Rose J. Independent review of the teaching of early reading 2006, Department for Education and Skills, London.
• Sabatini J.P., Sawaki Y., Shore J.R., Scarborough H.S. Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010, 43(2):122-138.
• Savage R. The "simple view" of reading: some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice 2001, 17(1):17-33.
• Savage R. Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading 2006, 10(2):143-164.
• Seigneuric A., Ehrlich M.F., Oakhill J.V., Yuill N. Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2000, 13:81-103.
• Share D.L. On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" ortography. Pyschological Bulletin 2008, 134(4):584-615.
• Spear-Swerling L. Fourth graders' performance on a state-mandated assessment involving two different measures of reading comprehension. Reading Psychology an International Quarterly 2004, 25(2):121-148.
• Stanovich K.E., Cunningham A.E., Feeman D.J. Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly 1984, 29:278-303.
• Stuart M. Fine tuning the national literacy strategy to ensure continuing progress in improving standards of reading in the UK: Some suggestions for change. Paper presented at the Invitational seminar organised by the Standards and Effectiveness Unit of the Department for Education and Skills, British Government 2003.
• Tilstra J., McMaster K., Van Den Broek P., Kendeou P., Rapp D. Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading 2009, 32(4):383-401.
• Tiu R.D., Thompson L.A., Lewis B.A. The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2003, 36(5):424-436.
• Handbook of psycholinguistics 2006, Elsevier, New York. 2nd ed. M.J. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
• Tunmer W., Greaney K. Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010, 43(3):229-243.
• White H.D. Scientific communication and literature retrieval. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 41-55. Russel Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
• Wilkinson I.A.G., Freebody P., Elkins J. Reading research in Australia and Aoteroa/New Zealand. Handbook of reading research 2000, vol. 3:3-16. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
• Woodcock R. Woodcock reading mastery tests, revised, examiner's manual 1998, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.
• Young-Suk K., Wagner R.K., Foster E. Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading 2011, 15(4):338-362.
• Yovanoff P., Duesbery L., Alonzo J., Tindal G. Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2005, Fall:4-12.