Heterotopía y capitalismo en arquitecturala función ideológica de las heterotopías como discurso propio de la disciplina arquitectónica en la era de la gobernanza biopolítica

  1. Jorge León Casero 1
  2. Julia Urabayen 2
  1. 1 Universidad San Jorge, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Navarra, España
Journal:
Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

ISSN: 0210-1963

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Crisis, incertidumbre y vulnerabilidades sociales

Volume: 193

Issue: 784

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3989/ARBOR.2017.784N2008 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Almost all the studies about Heterotopias undertaken in the field of architecture have focused on the identification or development of certain spaces as counter-sites, i.e., spaces able to put up resistance to the disciplinary techniques of an administrative power that normalises and controls individuals. By contrast, the present paper holds that, once the disciplinary conception of power has lead to biopolitics and completed the process of a real subsumption of society into capital, Heterotopias have begun to work unambiguously, optimising neoliberal relations of governance and production, losing the emancipatory power sometimes still ascribed to give way to their having an ideological and mystifying function for the power they purport to resist. Through the concept of Heterotopia, architects, urban planners and geographers continue to act as technicians in the service of capital, while nevertheless sincerely believing in the emancipatory power of their work.

Bibliographic References

  • Agier, M. (2013). Le campement urbain comme hétérotopie et comme refuge. Vers un paysage mondial des espaces précaires. Brésil(s). Sciences humaines et sociales, 3, pp. 11-28.
  • Bartling, H. (2008). A master-planned community as heterotopia: The Villages, Florida. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 165-178. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Betsky, A. (1997). Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire. New York: William Morrow and Company.
  • Broch, H. (2009). Huguenau o el realismo. Madrid: Debolsillo.
  • Cacciari, M. (1969). Sulla genesi del pensiero negativo. Contropiano, 1, pp. 131-200.
  • Cacciari, M., Rella, F., Tafuri, M. y Teyssot, G. (1977). Il dispositivo Foucault. Venezia: Cluva.
  • Cenzatti, M. (2008). Heterotopias of difference. En Dehaene, M. y de Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 75-85. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Constantinou, C. (2014). Heterotopias of Production. Unveiling the Everydayness of the Cypriot Economy. The Cyprus Review, 26, 1, pp. 127-143.
  • Cowherd, R. (2008). The heterotopian divide in Jakarta: constructing discourse, constructing space. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 275- 286. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Defert, D. (1997). Foucault, Space and the Architects. En: David, C. y Chevreir, J.-F. Politics / Poetics - Documenta X: The Book. Ostfildern-Ruit: Cantz Verlag, pp. 274-283.
  • Foucault, M. (1978). Espacios otros: utopías y heterotopías. Carrer de la ciutat, 1, pp. 5-9.
  • Foucault, M. (1984). Des espaces autres. Une conférence inédite de Michel Foucault. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, pp. 46-49.
  • Foucault, M. (1986a). Of Other Spaces. Diacritics, 16, 1, pp. 22-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
  • Foucault, M. (1986b). Of Other Spaces. Utopias and Heterotopias. Lotus, 48, 9, pp. 9-17.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). Tecnologías del yo y otros textos afines. Barcelona: Paidós. PMCid:PMC171908
  • Foucault, M. (1998). Las palabras y las cosas. Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Foucault, M. (1999). Estética, ética y hermenéutica. Barcelona: Paidós. PMCid:PMC1220032
  • Foucault, M. (2005). Vigilar y castigar. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Foucault, M. (2006). Seguridad, territorio y población. Curso en el Collège de Francia (1977-1978). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Foucault, M. (2007). El nacimiento de la biopolítica. Curso en el Collège de Francia (1978-1979). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Foucault, M. (2009). El cuerpo utópico. Las heterotopías. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.
  • Frampton, K. (1998). Historia crítica de la arquitectura moderna. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  • Genocchio, B. (1995). Discourse, Discontinuity, Difference: The Question of Other Spaces. En: Watson, S. y Gibson, K. (eds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 35-46.
  • Goodman, R. (1972). After the Planners. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  • Guarrasi, V. (2001). Paradoxes of Modern and Postmodern Geography: Heteroto pia of Landscape and Cartographic Logic. En: Minca, C. (ed.). Postmodern Geography. London: Blackwell, pp. 226-237.
  • Guillot, X. (2008). The 'institutionalization' of heterotopias in Singapore. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 179-188. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Hetherington, K. (1997). The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428870
  • Heynen, H. (2008). Heterotopia unfolded? En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 311-323. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Heyns, M. (2008). 'Rubbing the magic lamp': heterotopian strategies in London's eastern City fringe. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 227- 246. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Hook, D. y Vrdoljak, M. (2002). Gated Communities, heterotopia and a "rights" of privilege: a 'heterotopology' of the South African security-park. Geoforum, 33, pp. 195-219. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00039-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00039-2
  • International Building Exhibition Berlin 1987 (vol. 5). A+U.
  • Jacobs, J. (1973). Muerte y vida de las grandes ciudades. Barcelona: Península.
  • Jacobs, J. (1975). La economía de las ciudades. Barcelona: Península.
  • Jacobs, K. (2004). Pornography in Small Places and Other Spaces. Cultural Studies, 18, pp. 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000181610
  • Johnson, P. (2012a). History of the Concept of Heterotopía. Heterotopian Studies. Disponible en http://www. heterotopiastudies.com/wp-content/ uploads/2012/05/2.1-History-of-Concept.pdf
  • Johnson, P. (2012b). Some reflections on the relationship between utopia and heterotopia. Heterotopian Studies. Disponible en: http://www.heterotopiastudies.com/wp-content/ uploads/2012/05/Reflections-on-the-relationship-between-utopia-and-heterotopia.pdf
  • Johnson, P. (2013). The Geographies of Heterotopia. Geography Compass, 7, 11, pp. 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12079
  • Johnson, P. (2016). Interpretations on Heterotopia (revised). Heterotopian Studies. Disponible en http://www. heterotopiastudies.com/wp-content/ uploads/2012/05/Interpretations-of- Heterotopia-pdf.pdf
  • Johnson, P. y Wigley, M. (1988). Arquitectura Deconstructivista. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  • Kahn, M. (1995). Heterotopic Dissonance in the Museum Representation of Pacific Island Cultures. American Anthropologist, 97, 2, pp. 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1995.97.2.02a00100
  • Kern, K. (2008). Heterotopia of the theme park street. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 105-116. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Knight, K. (2014). Real Places and Impossible Spaces: Foucault's Heterotopia in the Fiction of James Joyce, Vladimir Nabokov, and W.G. Sebald. [Tesis doctoral inédita]. University of East Anglia: Norwick, Norfolk.
  • Koolhaas, R. (2002). The Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping. New York: Taschen. PMCid:PMC1302012
  • Koolhaas, R. (2004). Delirio de Nueva York. Un manifiesto retroactivo para Manhattan. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  • Lees, L. (1997). Ageographia, Heterotopia, and Vancouver's New Public Library. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 1, pp. 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1068/d150321
  • Lefebvre, H. (1971). De lo rural a lo urbano. Barcelona: Península.
  • León, J. y Urabayen, J. (2017). Espacio, Poder y Gobernamentalidad. Arquitectura y urbanismo en la obra de Foucault. Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, XXXIX, 111 (en prensa).
  • Liff, S. (2003). Shaping e-Access in the Cybercafé: Networks, Boundaries and Heterotopian Innovation. New Media and Society, 5, 3, pp. 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448030053002
  • Lou, J. (2007). Revitalising Chinatown into a Heterotopia. Space and Culture, 10, 2, pp. 107-194.
  • Low, S. (2008). The gated community as heterotopia. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 153-164. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Marx, K. (1999). El capital I. Crítica de la Economía Política. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • McLeod, M. (1997). Everyday and "Other" Spaces. En Coleman, D. L., Danze, E. A. y Henderson. C. J. (eds). Architecture and Feminism. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 182-202.
  • Muzzio, D., Muzzio-Rentas, J. (2008). 'A kind of instinct': the cinematic mall as heterotopia. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 137-150. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Negri, A. (2012). Marx más allá de Marx. Cuaderno de trabajo sobre los Grundisse. Madrid: Akal.
  • Negri, A. y Hardt, M. (2004). Multitud. Guerra y democracia en la era del Imperio. Barcelona: Debate.
  • Orillard, C. (2008). Between shopping malls and agoras: a French history of 'protected public space'. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. Lon don and New York: Routledge, pp. 117- 136. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Owens, B. M. (2002). Monumentality, Identity and the State: Local Practice, World Heritage, and Heterotopia at Swayambhu, Nepal. Anthropological Quarterly, 75, 2, pp. 269-316. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2002.0037
  • Petti, A. (2008). Dubai offshore urbanism. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 287-296. Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Porphyrios, D. (1982). Sources of Modern Eclecticism. London: Academy Editions.
  • Rowe, C. (1980). Ciudad Collage. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  • Saldanha, A. (2008). Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and Planning A, 40, 9, pp. 2080-2096. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39336
  • Sevilla Buitrago, A., Roch Pe-a, F. y Fernández Güell, J. M. (2011). Espectros de Lefebvre. Urban, NS02, pp. 3-6. Disponible en http://polired.upm.es/index.php/urban/article/view/1454/1777
  • Shane, G. (2008). Heterotopias of illusion: from Beaubourg to Bilbao and beyond. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 259-271 Disponible en: https://www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Soja, E. (1995). Heterotopologies: A Remembrance of Other Spaces in the Citadel-LA. En Watson, S. y Gibson, K. (eds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 13-34.
  • Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stickells, L. (2008). Flow Urbanism: the heterotopia of flows. En: Dehaene, M. y De Cauter, L. (eds.). Heterotopia and the City. Public space in a postcivil society. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 247- 258. Disponible en: https: //www.hse.ru/ data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20 Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20 Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf
  • Tamboukou, M. (2000). Of Other Spaces: women's colleges at the turn of the nineteenth century in the UK. Gender, Place and Culture, 7, 3, pp. 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/713668873
  • Tonna, J. (1990). The Poetics of Arab-Islamic Architecture. Muqarnas, 7, pp. 182- 197. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523128 https://doi.org/10.2307/1523128
  • Wallenstein, S.-O. (2001). Foucault and Biopolitics. SITE, 1.
  • Wallenstein, S.-O. (2007). Foucault and the Genealogy of Modern Architecture. En Wallenstein, S.-O. Essays. Lectures. Stockholm: Axl Books, pp. 361-404.
  • Willis, J., Lynn, E. y Gettings, P. (2013). MOOCs and Foucault's Heterotopia: On Community and Self-Efficacy. Instructional Development Center Publications. Paper 5. Disponible en http://docs.lib. purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=idcpubs
Data source: Dialnet