¿Es posible la reducción epistemológica?Todo sistema necesita presupuestos extra-sistémicos

  1. Orón, José V.
  2. Sánchez-Cañizares, Javier
Revista:
Anuario filosófico

ISSN: 0066-5215

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 50

Número: 3

Páginas: 601-617

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/009.50.3.601-617 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario filosófico

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Is an epistemological reduction strictly possible? Scientific methodology claims that a boundary separating the system from the “extra-system” can be defined. However, no system defines its own limits: rather, every system needs extra-systemic presuppositions that are defi ned from outside the system. In this article, we show how various areas of knowledge presuppose the presence of an extra-systemic reality that provides meaning: to know any system, knowledge of the “extra-system” is also necessary.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • P. Oppenheim, H. Putnam, Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis, "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science" 2 (1958) 3-36.
  • R. Mangabeira Unger, L. Smolin, The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time: A Proposal in Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
  • K. Jaspers, La naturaleza de la ciencia, en S. SÁNCHEZ-MIGALLÓN (ed.), La idea de la universidad (Eunsa, Pamplona, 2013) 23-55.
  • M. Artigas, La mente del universo (Eunsa, Pamplona, 1999).
  • G. Chaitin, Randomness and Mathematical Proof, "Scientific American" 232 (1975) 47
  • G. Chaitin, Meta Math! The Quest for Omega (Vintage Books, New York, 2005).
  • R. Penrose, The Road to Reality. A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe (Jonathan Cape, London, 2004).
  • M. Epperson, E. Zafiris, Foundations of Relational Realism. A Topological Approach to Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Nature (Lexington Books, Lanham, Maryland etc., 2013).
  • D. WALLACE, Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, en D. RICKLES (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to the New Philosophy of Physics (Ashgate, Aldershot; Burlington, VT, 2008) 16-98.
  • A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?, "Physical Review" 47 (1935) 777-780
  • A. ASPECT, P. GRANGIER, G. ROGER, Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities, "Physical Review Letters" 49/2 (1982) 91-94.
  • G. Bacciagaluppi, The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics, en E. N. ZALTA (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition).
  • L. Smolin, Time Reborn. From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe (Houghton Mifflin, Boston-New York, 2013).
  • F. Sols, ¿Puede la ciencia ofrecer una explicación última de la realidad?, en F. MOLINA (ed.), Ciencia y Fe. En el camino de la búsqueda (CEU Ediciones, Madrid, 2014).
  • E. B. Falk, L. W. Hyde, C. Mitchell, J. Faul, R. Gonzalez, M. M. Heitzeg, J. Schulenberg, What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science, "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America" 110/44 (2013) 17615-17622
  • R. Lent, F. A. C. Azevedo, C. H. Andrade-Moraes, A. V. O. Pinto, How many neurons do you have? Some dogmas of quantitative neuroscience under revision, "The European Journal of Neuroscience" 35/1 (2012) 1-9.
  • S. Firestein, Ignorance: How it Drives Science (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012)
  • H. Markram, Seven challenges for neuroscience, "Functional Neurology" 28/3 (2013) 145-151.
  • O. Sporns, Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience, "Nature Neuroscience" 17/5 (2014) 652-660.
  • C. Blanco, Historia de la neurociencia. El conocimiento del cerebro y la mente desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar (Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 2014).
  • E. Gordon, Integrative neuroscience, "Neuropsychopharmacology" Suppl 1 (2003) S2-S8
  • S. H. Koslow, Discovery and integrative neuroscience, "Clinical EEG and Neuroscience" 36/2 (2005) 55-63.
  • M. J. Farah, Neuroethics: the ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience, "Annual Review of Psychology" 63 (2012) 571-591.
  • O. Sporns, The human connectome: a complex network, "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences" 1224 (2011) 109-125.
  • D. S. Bassett, M. S. Gazzaniga, Understanding complexity in the human brain, "Trends in Cognitive Sciences" 15/5 (2011) 200-209
  • J. Greene, J. Haidt, How (and where) does moral judgment work?, "Trends in Cognitive Sciences" 6/12 (2002) 517-523
  • H. K. Ma, The moral development of the child: an integrated model, "Front Public Health" 18/1 (2013) 57
  • D. Narváez, Human Flourishing and Moral Development: Cognitive and Neurobiological Perspectives of Virtue D evelopment, en L. NUCCI, E. NARVÁEZ (eds.), Handbook of Moral and Character Education (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2008) 310-327
  • J. Rest, C. Power, M. Brabeck, Lawrance Kohlberg (1927-1987), "American Psychologist" 43/5 (1988) 399-400.
  • E. Douvan, Erik Erikson: critical times, critical theory, "Child Psychiatry and Human Development" 28/1 (1997) 15-21
  • L. J. Friedman, Identity's Architect: A Biography of Erik H. Erikson (Scribner, New York, 1999)
  • J. Marcia, R. Josselson, Eriksonian Personality Research and Its Implications for Psychotherapy, "Journal of Personality" 81/6 (2013) 617-629.
  • L. Kohlberg, The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgment, "Journal of Philosophy" 70/18 (1973) 630-646.
  • E. H. Erikson, El ciclo vital completo (Paidós, Barcelona, 1997).
  • L. Kohlberg, R. A. Ryncarz, Beyond Justice Reasoning: Moral Development and Consideration of Seventh Stage, en E. LANGER, C. N. ALEXANDER (eds.), Higher stage of human Development (Oxford University Press, New York, 1990) 191-207.
  • B. Inhelder, J. Piaget, The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence (Basic Books, New York, 1958).
  • L. Polo, Curso de teoría del conocimiento. Tomos I, II, III y IV (Eunsa, Pamplona, 2006).
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet