El intelecto agente según algunos Maestros franciscanos del s. XVIIB. Mastri y B. Belluti, L. Rabesano y J. Ponce

  1. Juan Fernando Sellés Dauder 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Revue:
Carthaginensia: Revista de estudios e investigación

ISSN: 0213-4381,  2605-3012

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 35

Número: 67

Pages: 129-146

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Carthaginensia: Revista de estudios e investigación

Résumé

In this work we study the interpretation of two franciscain masters of the XVIIth century over the agent intellect: Bartolomei Mastri and Bonaventura Belluti, Livio Rabesano, Juan Ponce. All of them are very well-documented thinkers about previous sources. The first two held that the agent and possible are the same intellect. The last two, that between them exist a formal distinction ‘ex natura rei’. All of them affirmed that the agent intellect does not know, and that therefore, the possible is superior to the agent.

Références bibliographiques

  • Aristóteles, De anima, l. III; cap. 5, Bk 430 a 10-24. Trad. de T. Calvo Martínez, Ma¬drid, Gredos, 1999, 234.
  • Bartholomaei Mastrii de Meldula etBonaventure Belluti, Disputationes in Arist. Stag. libros de anima, Tomus tertius continens: disputationes ad mentem Scoti in Aristote¬lis… libros de anima, Venetiis, apud Nicolaum Pezzana, 1678.
  • Ioannis Poncii, Cursus Philosophicus. Philosophiae ad mentem Scoti Cursus integer, Ioannis Antonii Huguetan & Marci Antonii Ravaud, 1659.
  • Livio Rabesano de Montursio, Cursus Philosophicus ad mentem Doctoris Subtilis, Pars Tertia, Tres Libros Aristotelis De anima, Venetiis, apud Niccolaum Pezzana, 1665.
La source de données: Dialnet