La intervención federal en los Estados Unidos de América

  1. Fernando Simón Yarza 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Journal:
Revista española de derecho constitucional

ISSN: 0211-5743

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Art. 155 de la Constitución

Year: 40

Issue: 120

Pages: 81-110

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18042/CEPC/REDC.120.03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista española de derecho constitucional

Abstract

Although a Constitutional clause similar to our article 155 or to article 37 Bonn Basic Law does not exist in the United States, federal intervention has found a source of legitimacy both in the United States Constitution and in the statutes developing it. However, the scope of the provisions regarding federal intervention can only be understood through the narratives that place them and provide them with meaning. The purpose of this article is precisely to explain the historical development of the norms regarding federal intervention and their application in the United States, from the ratification of the Constitution to our days. As will be seen, federal coercion in critical moments has been decisive for the development of a true American national identity.

Bibliographic References

  • Ackerman, B. (1998). We the People. Vol. 2: Transformations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Amar, A. R. (1987). Of Sovereignty and Federalism. The Yale Law Journal, 96 (7), 1425­ 1520. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/796493.
  • Amar, A. R. (1998). The Bill of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Arendt, H. (1959). Reflections on Little Rock. Dissent, 56 (1), 45­56.
  • Baldwin, L. D. (1968). Whiskey Rebels. The Story of a Frontier Uprising. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Blackstone, W. (2009). The Commentaries of Sir William Blackstone, Knight, on the Laws and Constitution of England (1796 ed.; abridged). Chicago: American Bar Association.
  • Coakley, R. W. (1988). The Role of Military Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1789-1878. Washington: Center of Military History.
  • Cover, R. M. (1983). The Supreme Court Term 1982. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review, 97 (4), 4­68. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787.
  • Diamond, R. T. (1989). Confrontation as Rejoinder to Compromise: Reflections on the Little Rock Desegregation Crisis. National Black Law Journal, 2, 151­176.
  • Ellis, R. E. (1987). The Union at Risk: Jacksonian Democracy, States’ Rights, and Nullification Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eisenhower, D. (1958). Public Papers of the Presidents: Eisenhower. Washington: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service.
  • Engdahl, D. (1971). Soldiers, Riots, and Revolution: The Law and History of Military Troops in Civil Disorders. Iowa Law Review, 57 (1), 1­73.
  • Farrand, M. (ed.) (1911). The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Gutzam, K. R. (2012). James Madison and the Making of America. New York: St Martin Press.
  • Hamilton, H., Madison, J. y Jay, J. (2003). The Federalist Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ketcham, R. (1971). James Madison. A Biography. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Ketcham, R. (ed.) (2006). The Selected Writings of James Madison. Indianapolis: The Hackett Publishing.
  • Kohn, R. H. (1972). The Washington Administration’s Decision to Crush the Whiskey Rebellion. The Journal of American History, 59 (3), 567­584. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.2307/1900658.
  • Lincoln, A. (1923). The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, V (1858-1862). New York: Putnam’s Sons.
  • Ogletree, C. J. (2005). All Deliberate Speed: Reflections on the First Half-Century of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: Norton.
  • Pohjankoski, P. (2016). Federal Coercion and National Constitutional Identity in the United States 1776­1861. American Journal of Legal History, 106, 326­358. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njw007.
  • Scheips, P. J. (2012). The Role of Federal Military Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1945-1992. Washington: Center of Military History.
  • Steele, B. (2008). Thomas Jefferson, Coercion, and the Limits of Harmonious Union. The Journal of Southern History, 74 (4), 823­854. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/ 27650316.
  • Story, J. (1873). Commentaries of the Constitution of the United States (vol. 1). Boston: Little Brown.
  • Vladeck, S. I. (2004). Emergency Power and the Militia Acts. The Yale Law Journal, 114, 149­194. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/4135718.
  • Washington, G. (1891). The Writings of George Washington, Vol. XII. New York; London: Putnam’s Sons.
Data source: Dialnet