Elementos antropológicos y éticos en el derecho penal de la Biblia Hebrea

  1. Francisco Varo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Revista:
Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

ISSN: 0716-5455

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 42

Páginas: 67-93

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S0716-54552020000100067 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Resumen En un acercamiento técnico a los textos jurídicos de la Biblia Hebrea se constata la presencia en ellos de elementos relevantes en la teoría del delito, como son la precisión en la definición de conductas, la toma en consideración del dolo, de la imprudencia, la existencia de circunstancias atenuantes o agravantes, o la responsabilidad por las acciones. El análisis de las distintas penas tipificadas en la Biblia Hebrea, y la justificación de ellas que se hace en los textos, ayuda a esclarecer el sentido que tiene la sanción penal. En toda la legislación bíblica se puede apreciar una prioridad de los valores humanos por encima de los bienes económicos y una conciencia de la responsabilidad individual, que llaman la atención en el contexto histórico en el que fueron compuestos esos textos. En suma, los fundamentos filosóficos y culturales subyacentes a los grandes códigos legales de la Torah irrumpieron como una notable novedad en su momento, y luego han dejado su huella en la configuración jurídica del mundo occidental.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bar, Shaul. (2012). The punishment of burning in the Hebrew Bible. Old Testament Essays. 25. 27-39
  • Berlin, Adele. (2009). Sex and the Single Girl in Deuteronomy 22. Mishneh Todah: Studies in Deuteronomy and its cultural environment in honor of Jeffrey H. Tigay. 95-112
  • Bozheku, Ersi. (2015). Tracing the criminal justice: an inquiry into the roots of the modern penal principles. Curentul Juridic. 18. 94-106
  • Burnside, Jonathan. (2011). God, Justice, and Society. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Burnside, Jonathan. (2006). Strange Flesh: Sex, Semiotics and the Construction of Deviancy in Biblical Law. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament. 30. 387-420
  • Chinitz, Jakob. (1995). Eye for an Eye - An Old Canard. Jewish Quarterly Review. 23. 79-85
  • Cocco, Francesco. (2016). The Torah as a Place of Refuge. Biblical Criminal Law and the Book of Numbers. Mohr Siebeck. Tübingen.
  • Cortez, Marc. (2006). The law on violent intervention: Deuteronomy 25:11-12 revisited. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament. 30. 431
  • Daube, David. (1961). Direct and Indirect Causation in Biblical Law. Vetus Testamentum. 11. 246
  • Diamond, Arthur Sigismund. (1971). Primitive Law, Past and Present. Methuen & Co. Ltd.. London.
  • Dion, Paul-Eugène. (1984). De Septuaginta: studies in honour of John William Wevers on his 65th birthday. Benben Publications. Mississauga Ontario.
  • Elliott, John Hall. (2006). Deuteronomy - Shameful Encroachment on Shameful Parts: Deuteronomy 25:11-12 and Biblical Euphemism. Ancient Israel: the Old Testament in its social context. 161
  • Elliott, John Hall. (2005). Kontexte der Schrift: Wolfgang Stegemann zum 60. Geburtstag. W. Kohlhammer. Stuttgart.
  • Fensham, F. (1960). Charles, Exodus 21:18-19 in the light of Hittite law 10. Vetus Testamentum. 10. 333
  • Flatto, David C.. (2018). Constructing Justice: The Selective Use of Scripture in Formulating Early Jewish Accounts of the Courts. Harvard Theological Review. 111. 488-515
  • Frymer-Kensky, Tikva. (1980). Tit for tat: The Principle of Equal Retribution in Near Eastern and Biblical Law. Biblical Archeologist. 43. 230
  • Fuad, Chelcent. (2019). The Curious Case of the Blasphemer: Ambiguity as Literary Device in Leviticus 24:10-23. Horizons in Biblical Theology. 41. 51-70
  • Greenberg, Moshe. (1960). Yehezkel Kaufmann Jubilee Volume. Magnes Press. Jerusalem.
  • Hadad, Eliezer. (2017). ‘Unintentionally’ (Numbers 35:11) and ‘Unwittingly’ (Deuteronomy 19:4): Two Aspects of the Cities of Refuge. AJS Review. 41. 155
  • Jackson, Bernard. (2013). On the Values of Biblical Law and their Contemporary Application. Political Theology. 14. 602
  • Jackson, Bernard. (2006). Wisdom & Laws: A Study of the Mishpatim of Exodus 21:1-22:16. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Jackson, Bernard. (1973). The Problem of Exod. xxi.22-25 (Ius Talionis). Vetus Testamentum. 23. 273-304
  • Johnson, Scott L.. (2000). The Bible and the Death Penalty: Implications for Criminal Justice Education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 11. 15-33
  • Jonker, Louis C.. (2019). Achaemenid Understanding of Law and Justice in Darius I’s Tomb Inscriptions: Are There Any Connections with Hebrew Bible Pentateuchal Conceptions?. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament. 33. 24-41
  • Kašný, Jiří. (2016). Criminal Law in the Hebrew Bible (en checo). Studia Theologica. 18. 1-21
  • Kent, Charles Foster. (1901). The Humanitarian Element in the Old Testament Legislation. The Biblical World. 18. 270
  • Leuchter, Mark. (2011). The Ambiguous Details in the Blasphemer Narrative: Sources and Redaction in Leviticus 24:10-23. Journal of Biblical Literature. 130. 431
  • L’Hour, Jean. (1963). Une législation criminelle dans le Deutéronome. Biblica. 44. 1-28
  • Makujina, John. (2013). The Semantics of in Exodus 21:22: Reassessing the Variables that Determine Meaning. Bulletin for Biblical Research. 23. 305
  • Mattison, Kevin. (2018). Contrasting Conceptions of Asylum in Deuteronomy 19 and Numbers 35. Vetus Testamentum. 68. 232
  • Milbank, John. (2018). Theology and the Idea of University. Scripta Theologica. 50. 253
  • Milgrom, Jacob. (1991). Leviticus 1-16. The Anchor Bible. Doubleday. New York.
  • Naeh, Shlomo,Shemesh, Aharon. (2013). Deuteronomy 19:15-19 in the Damascus Document and Early Midrash. Dead Sea Discoveries. 20. 179
  • Nardoni, Enrique. (2004). Rise Up, O Judge: A Study of Justice in the Biblical World. Hendrickson Publishers. Peabody Massachusetts.
  • Nelson, Richard D.. (2002). Deuteronomy: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox. Louisville.
  • Nihan, Christophe. (2007). From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch: A Study in the Composition of the Book of Leviticus. Mohr Siebeck. Tübingen.
  • Osumi, Yuichi. (1991). Die kompositionsgeschichte des Bundesbuches Exodus 20,22b-23,33. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Freiburg-Göttingen.
  • Otto, Eckart. (2004). Religions of the Ancient World. A Guide. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge MA.
  • Pearce, Sarah. (2006). Biblical traditions in transmission: essays in honour of Michael A. Knibb. Brill. Leiden -Boston.
  • Pérez Gondar, Diego. (2018). Culto, autoridad y tradición. La comunidad judía de Elefantina y la religiosidad vinculada a su templo. Scripta Theologica. 50. 23-52
  • Pikov, Gennady. (2010). Criminal Law in the Bible (en ruso). Schole: Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. 4. 101
  • Pritikin, Martin H.. (2006). Punishment, Prisons, and the Bible: Does “Old Testament Justice” Justify Our Retributive Culture?. Cardozo Law Review. 28. 715
  • Reeder, Caryn A.. (2012). Wives and Daughters: Women, Sex, and Violence in Biblical Tradition. Ex auditu. 28. 122
  • Schoneveld, Jacobus. (1973). Symbolae Biblicae et Mesopotamicae: Francisco Mario Theodoro de Liagre Böhl dedicatae. Brill. Leiden.
  • Schenker, Adrian. (2003). Book of Leviticus: Composition and Reception. Brill. Leiden.
  • Schwienhorst-Schönberger, Ludger. (1990). Das Bundesbuch (Ex 20,22-23,33). Studien zu seiner Entstehung und Theologie. De Gruyter. Berlin.
  • Seebass, Horst. (1999). Zum Sklavenrecht in Ex 21,28-32 und der Diskrepanz zwischen Ersatzrecht und Todesrecht. Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte. 5. 179
  • Stackert, Jeffrey. (2006). Why does Deuteronomy legislate cities of refuge?: asylum in the covenant collection (Exodus 21:12-14) and Deuteronomy (19:1-13). Journal of Biblical Literature. 125. 23-49
  • Steiner, Richard C.. (2015). Disembodied Souls: the Nefesh in Israel and Kindred Spirits in the Ancient Near East, with an appendix on the Katumuwa Inscription. SBL Press. Atlanta.
  • Stulman, Louis. (1990). Encroachment in Deuteronomy. An analysis of the Social World of the D Code. Journal of Biblical Literature. 109. 613
  • Tigay, Jeffrey H.. (1996). Deuteronomy: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New JPS Translation. Jewish Publication Society. Philadelphia.
  • Tsevat, Matitiahu. (1961). Interpretation of 1 Sam 2:27-36. The Narrative of Kareth. Hebrew Union College Annual. 32. 191-216
  • Varo, Francisco. (2018). L’arrière-plan sociologique du champ sémantique de l’étranger dans le Pentateuque. Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques. 102. 385-414
  • Vroom, Jonathan. (2012). Recasting mišpātîm: Legal Innovation in Leviticus 24:10-23. Journal of Biblical Literature. 131. 27-44
  • Wagner, Angela B.. (2013). Considerations on the Politico-Juridical Proceedings of Genesis 34. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament. 38. 145
  • Walfish, Ruth. (2012). Joseph and the eglah arufah. Jewish Bible Quarterly. 40. 25
  • Walsh, Jerome T.. (2004). ‘You shall cut off her...palm’?: a reexamination of Deuteronomy 25:11-12. Journal of Semitic Studies. 49. 47-58
  • Weingreen, Jacob. (1989). Concepts in Ancient Biblical Civil and Criminal Law. The Irish Jurist. 24. 113
  • Westbrook, Raymond,Wells, Bruce. (2009). Everyday Law in Biblical Israel. Westminster John Knox Press. Louisville Kentucky.
  • Whitekettle, Richard. (2018). Life’s Labors Lost: Priestly Death and Returning Home From a City of Refuge in Ancient Israel. Harvard Theological Review. 111. 333
  • Williams, Gary R.. (1976). The Purpose of Penology in the Mosaic Law and Today. Bibliotheca Sacra. 133. 42-55
  • Wright, David P.. (1987). Deuteronomy 21:1-9 as a rite of elimination. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 49. 387-403
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet