La intertextualidad entre Jc 5,12; Sal 68,19 (y sus versiones siríaca y aramea) y Ef 4,8. Una aproximación desde la estilística sociológica

  1. Pérez Gondar, Diego 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Journal:
Ilu. Revista de ciencias de las religiones

ISSN: 1135-4712,  1988-3269

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 24

Pages: 109-123

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/ILUR.75205 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ilu. Revista de ciencias de las religiones

Abstract

Some intuitions of Sociological Stylistics are effective to better perceive how the intertextual dependence between documents is the reflection of a concrete and historical social dialogism. This approach helps to balance the historicist vision and does justice to the texts. This work analyzes the dependencies between Judg 5:12; Ps 68:19 and Eph 4:8, taking into account their different versions and points of view. These concrete texts show an intertextual dependence in which literality takes a secondary value with respect to the historical novelty that originates the new enunciation. In addition, each new context governs the use of the previous word endowed with authority and does so in order to preserve it. The Christian paschal mystery or the reconfiguration of Judaism after the destruction of the Temple (70 AD) conditions the way of updating an ancient text using it with new purposes.

Bibliographic References

  • Allen, G., 2000, Intertextuality. The New Critical Idiom, London-New York.
  • Bajtín, M., 1986, Problemas de la poética de Dostoievski, (trad. esp.), México D.F.
  • Bajtín, M., 1989, Teoría y estética de la novela, (trad. esp.), Madrid.
  • O’Day, G. R., 1999, “Intertextuality”, en Hayes, J. H. (Ed.), Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation, Nashville, 546-548.
  • Ehorn, S. M., 2012, “The Use of Psalm 68(67).19 in Ephesians 4.8: A History of Research”, CBR 12, 96-120.
  • Ehorn, S. M., 2014, The Citation of Psalm 68(67).19 in Ephesians 4.8 within the Context of Early Christian Uses of the Psalms, (Thesis), University of Edinburgh, https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/17946?show=full [acceso: 20.09.18].
  • Elliger, E.  Rudolph, W. (Ed.), 1967-19775, Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, Stuttgart.
  • Fernández Marcos, N.Spottorno Díaz-Caro, M. V. (Coords.), 2011, La Biblia Griega Septuaginta. II Libros históricos, Salamanca.
  • Fernández Marcos, N.Spottorno Díaz-Caro, M. V. (Coords.), 2013, La Biblia Griega Septuaginta. III Libros poéticos y sapienciales, Salamanca.
  • Fitzmyer, J. A., 1984, “The Ascension of Christ and Pentecost”, Theological Studies 45, 408-440.
  • González, E., 2016, “Hermenéutica y teología en la interpretación paulina del AT. Un status quaestionis”, Scripta Theologica 48 405-423.
  • González, E., 2017, “Cristo como mediador (μεσίτης) en el NT”, Scripta Theologica 49, 279-299.
  • Harris, W. H., III, 1988, The Descent of Christ in Ephesians 4:7-11. An Exegetical Investigation with Special Reference to the Influence of Traditions about Moses Associated with Psalm 68:19, (Thesis), University of Sheffield, http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3469/ [acceso: 20.09.18].
  • Hays, R. B., 1989, Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul, New Haven-London.
  • Hays, R. B., 2005, The Conversion of the Imagination: Paul as Interpreter of Israel´s Scripture, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
  • Hays, R. B., 2009, Reading the Bible Intertextually, Wako, Texas.
  • Hays, R. B., 2016, Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels, Wako, Texas.
  • Kraus, H. J., 1993-1995, Los Salmos, 2 vols., Salamanca.
  • Lincoln, A. T., 1982, “The Use of OT in Ephesians”, JSNT 14,16-57.
  • Mandolfo, C., 2007, “Dialogic Form Criticism: An Intertextual Reading of Lamentations and Psalms of Lament”, en Boer, R. (Ed.), Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies (Semeia Studies 63), Atlanta, 69-90.
  • Milán, F., 2016, “Biblia e intertextualidad: una aproximación”, Scripta Theologica 48, 357-379.
  • Morris, P. (Ed.), 2009, The Bakhtin Reader. Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov, London.
  • Nestle, E. & E., Aland, B. & K., Karavidopoulos, J., Martini, C. M., Metzget, B. M. (Eds.), 201228, Novum Testamentum graece, Stuttgart.
  • Rahlfs, A. (Ed.), 19792, Septuaginta. Id est Vetus Testamentum graece iuxta LXX interpretes, Stuttgart.
  • Rahlfs, A. (Ed.), 19672, Psalmi cum odis, en Septuaginta: Vetus graece auctoritate Societatis Göttingensis editum, vol. 10, Göttingen.
  • Rubinkiewicz, R., 1975, “Ps LXVIII 19 (=Eph IV 8). Another textual tradition or targum?”, NT 17, 219-224.
  • Sandmel, S., 1962, “Parallelomania”, JBL 81,1-13.
  • Schökel, L. A., 1992-1993, Salmos: traducción introducciones y comentario, 2 vols., Estella.
  • Scholtus, S., 2010, “Exegesis e interpretación paulina de Salmos 68:18 en Efesios 4:8-10”, DavarLogos 9, 171-186.
  • Smith, G. V., 1975, “Paul’s Use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8”, JETS 18, 181-189.
  • Stafford, J. R., 2013, “Paul’s Use of the Psalms. Beyond Midrash”, Perichoresis 11, 211-220.
  • Stec, D. M. (Ed.), 2004, The Targum of Psalms, (trad. ingl.), Collegeville, Minn.
  • Volóshinov, V. N., 2009, El marxismo y la filosofía del lenguaje: (los principales problemas del método sociológico en la ciencia del lenguaje), Buenos Aires.
  • Walter, D. M., (Ed.), 1980, The Old Testament in Syriac According to the Peshiṭta Version, II.3: Book of Psalms, Leiden.
  • Zenger, E. – Hossfeld, F.-L., 2005, Psalms 2: A Commentary on Psalms 51-100, Minneapolis.
Data source: Dialnet