La simpatía moral y el “efecto Lucifer”. Mal y redención en Breaking Bad

  1. García Martínez, Alberto Nahum
  2. Castrillo Maortua, Pablo
  3. Echart Orús, Pablo
Revista:
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

ISSN: 1138-5820

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 74

Páginas: 383-402

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2019-1336 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

Resumen

Introducción. Se analizan los mecanismos dramáticos y cognitivos que activan la identificación emocional con los protagonistas antiheroicos de la ficción serial, tomando como caso de estudio Breaking Bad. Metodología. Esta identificación se estudia a partir de los postulados del cognitivismo (Carroll, Plantinga, Smith), y se refuerza con los de la Media Psychology, aplicados a través de un close reading de la última temporada de la serie. Marco teórico. A partir de la noción de “estructura de simpatía” (Smith), se refieren cuatro estrategias dramáticas que modulan el juicio moral espectatorial contrario al antihéroe y se ilustra la relación de “familiaridad” que se establece con él a partir de la noción de “relato expandido”. Discusión. En su quinta temporada, el relato rompe la simpatía moral del espectador para recomponerla en los capítulos finales. Conclusiones. Se propone el concepto de simpatía moral como una síntesis de familiaridad y modulación de la perspectiva ética.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bernardelli, A. (2016): “Criminal Ethics. The Anti-Hero's Transformations in TV Series”. Between. 6(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/2120.
  • Blanchet, R. & Vaage, M. B. (2012): “Don, Peggy, and Other Fictional Friends? Engaging with Characters in Television Series”. Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind. 6(2), pp. 18–41.
  • Buonanno, M. (ed.) (2017). Television Antiheroines: Women Behaving Badly in Crime and Prison Drama. Chicago & Bristol: Chicago University Press & Intellect.
  • Carroll, N. (1999): “Film, Emotion, and Genre”, en Passionate Views: Film, Cognition and Emotion (Eds. Plantinga, C. R. & Smith, G. M.) (pp. 21–47). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Carroll, N. (2004): “Sympathy for the Devil”, en The Sopranos and Philosophy: I Kill Therefore I Am (Eds. Greene, R. & Vernezze, P.). Chicago: Open Court, pp. 121–36.
  • Carroll, N. (2010): “Movies, the Moral Emotions, and Sympathy”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 34(1), pp. 1–19.
  • Creeber, G. (2015): “Killing us softly: Investigating the aesthetics, philosophy and influence of Nordic Noir television”. The Journal of Popular Television. 3(1). pp. 21-35.
  • Donnelly, A. M. (2014): Renegade Hero or Faux Rogue: The Secret Traditionalism of Television Bad Boys. Jefferson: McFarland.
  • Eaton, A. W. (2012): “Robust Immoralism”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 70(3). pp. 281–92.
  • Eden, A., Daalmans, S. & Johnson, B. K. (2017): “Morality Predicts Enjoyment But Not Appreciation of Morally Ambiguous Characters”. Media Psychology. 20(3), pp. 349-73, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1182030.
  • Fitch III, J. (2016): “Archetypes on Screen: Odysseus, St. Paul, Christ and the American Cinematic Hero and Anti-Hero”. Journal of Religion & Film, 9(1). pp. 1-15. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol9/iss1/1 (fecha de consulta: 24 de abril de 2018).
  • Frye, N. (2006): Educated Imagination and Other Writings on Critical Theory, 1933–1962. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • García, A. N. (2016): “Moral Emotions, Antiheroes and the Limits of Allegiance”, en Emotions in Contemporary TV Series (Eds. A. N. García), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 52-70.
  • Genette, G. (1998): Nuevo discurso del relato. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Griswold, Ch. (2007): Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hagelin, S. & Silverman, G. (2017): “The female antihero and police power in FX’s Justified”. Feminist Media Studies 17(5), pp. 851-65.
  • Janicke, S. H. & Raney, A. A. (2017): “Modeling the Antihero Narrative Enjoyment Process”. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000152
  • Keen, S. (2006): “A Theory of Narrative Empathy”. Narrative. 14(3), pp. 207–36.
  • Lewis, M. (2010): “Self-Conscious Emotions: Embarrasment, Pride, Shame, and Guilt”, en Handbook of Emotions (Eds. M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. Feldman Barrett). New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 742-56.
  • Lotz, A. D. (2014): Cable Guys: Television and Masculinities in the 21st Century. New York: NYU Press.
  • Lury, K. (2016): “Introduction: situating television studies”. Screen. 57(2), pp. 119-23.
  • Mahon, J. E. & Mahon, J. (2017): “Recovering Lost Moral Ground: Can Walt Make Amends?”, en Philosophy and Breaking Bad (Eds. Decker, K. S., Koepsell, D. R. & Arp, R.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 143-60.
  • Martin, B. (2013): Difficult Men: Behind the Scenes of a Creative Revolution: From The Sopranos and The Wire to Mad Men and Breaking Bad. New York: The Penguin Press.
  • Mittell, J. (2006): "Narrative complexity in contemporary American television." The Velvet Light Trap. 58(1), pp. 29-40.
  • Neill, A. (1996): “Empathy and (Film) Fiction”, en Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies (Eds. Carroll, N. & Bordwell, D.) (pp. 175-94). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Nelson, R. (2007): State of Play: Contemporary ‘High-End’ TV Drama. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.
  • O’Sullivan, S. (2017): “The Inevitable, the Surprise, and Serial Television”, en Media of Serial Narrative (Ed. Kelleter, F.) (pp 204-21). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
  • Plantinga, C. (2010): “‘I Followed the Rules, and they all Loved You More’: Moral Judgment and Attitudes Toward Fictional Characters in Film”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34(1). pp. 34–51.
  • Plantinga, C. (2018): Screen Stories: Emotion and the Ethics of Engagement. Oxford University Press.
  • Sinnerbrink, R. (2016): “Cinempathy: Phenomenology, Cognitivism, and Moving Images”. Contemporary Aesthetics Special Volume 5, n.p. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/journal.php (fecha de consulta: 24-04-2018)
  • Smith, B. H. (2016): “What Was “Close Reading”? A Century of Method in Literary Studies”, Minnessota Review, 87, pp. 57-75.
  • Smith, M. (1994): "Altered states: character and emotional response in the cinema". Cinema Journal, 33(4), pp. 34-56.
  • Smith, M. (2011): “Just What is it That Makes Tony Soprano such an Appealing, Attractive Murderer?”, en Ethics at the Cinema (Eds. Jones, E. W. & Vice, S.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 66–90.
  • Stadler, J. (2017): “The Empath and the Psychopath: Ethics, Imagination, and Intercorporeality in Bryan Fuller's Hannibal”. Film-Philosophy 21(3). pp. 410-27.
  • Tan, E. S. (1995): “Film-induced affect as a witness emotion”. Poetics 23(1-2), pp. 7-32.
  • Turvey, M. (2018) “'Familiarity Breeds Contempt': Why Repeat Exposure Does Not Necessarily Turn TV Characters into Friends”, en Screening Characters (Eds. Riis, J. & Taylor, A.). New York: Routledge (en prensa).
  • Vaage, M. B. (2013): “Fictional Reliefs and Reality Checks”. Screen 54(2). pp. 218–37.
  • Vaage, M. B. (2014): “Blinded by Familiarity: Partiality, Morality and Engagement in Television Series”, en Cognitive Media Theory (Eds. Nannicelli, T. & Taberham, P.) (pp.268-84) New York: Routledge.
  • Vaage, M. B. (2016): The Antihero in American Television. New York: Routledge.
  • Van Dijk, W. W., van Dillen, L. F., Rotteveel, M. & Seip, E. C. (2017): “Looking into the crystal ball of our emotional lives: emotion regulation and the overestimation of future guilt and shame”. Cognition and Emotion, 31(3), pp. 616-24, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1129313.
  • Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet