Evolución y relatomás allá del neodarwinismo y el diseño inteligente

  1. Ortiz de Landázuri, Manuel Cruz 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Zeitschrift:
Scientia et fides

ISSN: 2300-7648

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 10

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 29-48

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.12775/SETF.2022.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Scientia et fides

Zusammenfassung

Evolution and Story: Beyond Neo-Darwinism and Intelligent Design This article analyses evolution from a philosophical perspective, contrasting the problems raised by both Neo-Darwinism and Intelligent Design theory. First, I discuss some of the problems that Synthetic theory presents from a scientific point of view, as well as the philosophical problems involved in the Neo-Darwinism of Dawkins, Dennett, Monod and Ruse. I argue that Neo-Darwinism, although presented as a scientific doctrine, is in fact fundamentally philosophical, and presents some important problems that make it difficult to believe. On the other hand, I discuss the scope of intelligent design as a philosophical stance on the evolution of living beings, showing its problems. Finally, I propose a credible philosophical account of evolution that seeks to go beyond a scientific reading of the data of experience

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Alexander, Denis R. 2020. “Is Evolution a Chance Process?”. Scientia et Fides 8: 15-41.
  • Artigas, Mariano. 1992. La inteligibilidad de la naturaleza. Pamplona: Eunsa.
  • Ayala, Francisco José. 2007. Darwin y el diseño inteligente. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Behe, Michael. 1999. La caja negra de Darwin. Barcelona: Andrés Bello.
  • Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J., Miller, S. 1988. “The origin of mutants”. Nature 335: 142-145.
  • Collado, Santiago. 2008. “Panorámica del «diseño inteligente»”. Acta Philosophica 17: 38.
  • Dawkins, Richard. 1988. El relojero ciego. Barcelona: Labor.
  • Dembski, William. 2006. Diseño inteligente. Madrid: Homo Legens.
  • Dennett, Daniel. 1999. La peligrosa idea de Darwin, Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.
  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1973. “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”. The American Biology Teacher: 125-129.
  • Gilson, Etienne. 1976. De Aristóteles a Darwin (y vuelta). Pamplona: Eunsa.
  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2001. “Information and the Argument from Design”. In Intelligent Design and Its Critics, edited by R. T. Pennock, 575-596. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Gould, Stephen. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Gould, Stephen. 1985. El pulgar del panda. Barcelona: Orbis.
  • Jablonka, Eva y Lamb, Marion. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions, Cambridge: MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Kitcher, Philip. 2001. “Born-Again Creationism”, In Intelligent Design and Its Critics, edited by R. T. Pennock, 257-287. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Koonin, Eugene V. 2019. “Lamarckian or not, CRISPR-Cas is an elaborate engine of directed evolution”. Biology and Philosophy 34, 17. doi: 10.1007/s10539-018-9666-7
  • Laublicher, Manfred, y Maienschein, Jane (eds.). 2009. Form and Function in Developmental Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayr, Ernst. 1988. “The Multiple Meanings of Teleological”, in Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 38-66.
  • Monod, Jacques. 1985. El azar y la necesidad. Barcelona: Orbis.
  • Platón. Timeo. Traducción de C. Eggers. 2005. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
  • Popper, Karl. 1983. Conjeturas y refutaciones. Barcelona: Paidos.
  • Ruse, Michael. 2003. Darwin and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Whitfield, John. 2008. “Postmodern Evolution?”. Nature 455: 281-284.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet