Production values as program quality signals in Spanish linear TVA comparison of two periods

  1. David Kimber-Camussetti
  2. Enrique Guerrero-Pérez
Revista:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 2386-7876

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Special Issue: Social news diffusion: Platforms, publics, scenarios and dimensions of news sharing

Volumen: 35

Número: 2

Páginas: 107-120

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/003.35.2.107-120 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Technology disruption, digitalization and media convergence have triggered a profound crisis in the television industry. In this context, quality is an essential strategic element for success, especially when consumers have learned through their experience with VOD, becoming more demanding and less loyal customers. Then, has the importance of quality signals changed with the emergence of new online alternatives? And the quality perception among viewers? Our research explores four production values (the host, content, the set, and technical quality) as TV program quality signals and their effect on the quality perception of entertainment programs of Spanish broadcasters. We compare two years: 2012 and 2016, a period during which the Spanish television market changed due to appearance of OTT services. Using t-tests and regression models, we establish that the importance of quality signals varied over this period, with content proving more important and the set less so in 2016 as compared with 2012. Additionally, in 2016, the results show that the quality perception of linear TV entertainment programs depended more on subjective elements such as liking and satisfaction than on objective elements, as it was in 2012. Finally, our findings are discussed, and some managerial implications and future research are suggested.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abercrombie, N. (1996). Television and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Albers, R. (1996). Quality in television from the perspective of the professional programme maker. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 101-144). Luton: John Libbey/University of Luton Press.
  • Artero, J. P., Etayo, C. & Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2015). The evolution of viewers’ concerns and perceptions of television content quality. Journal of Media Business Studies, 12(4), 205-223. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2015.1099274
  • Artero, J. P., Etayo, C., & Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2013). Effects of pragmatic and moral concerns on perceived TV quality. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 2(3), 489-504. https://www.doi.org/10.1386/ajms.2.3.489_1
  • Artero, J. P., Herrero, M. & Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2010). La calidad de la oferta televisiva en el mercado español: las percepciones del público. Zer, 15(28), 49-63. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/2344
  • Barger, V., Peltier, J. W. & Schultz, D. E. (2016). Social media and consumer engagement: a review and research agenda. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(4), 268-287. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2016-0065
  • Barlovento Comunicación (2022). Análisis televisivo 2021 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3A16XaV
  • Barlovento Comunicación (2020). Análisis televisivo 2019 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2VfSofR
  • Barlovento Comunicación (2019). Análisis televisivo 2013 a 2018 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3fOAJ8H
  • Bartsch, A. (2012). Emotional gratification in entertainment experience. Why viewers of movies and television series find it rewarding to experience emotions. Journal of Media Psychology, 15(3), 267-302. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.693811
  • Bayo-Moriones, A., Etayo, C. & Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2018). Revisiting quality television: the perceptions of the audience. International Journal on Media Management, 20(3), 193-215. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2018.1538146
  • Blumler, J. G. & Hoffman-Riem, W. (1993). Nuevas funciones para la televisión pública. In J. G. Blumler (Ed.), Televisión e interés público (pp. 257-275). Barcelona: Bosch Casa Editorial.
  • Cardwell, S. (2007). Is quality television any good? Generic distinctions, evaluations and the troubling matter of critical judgement. In J. McCabe & K. Akass (Eds.), Quality TV: Contemporary American television and beyond (pp. 19-34). London: IB Tauris.
  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M. & Wolter, L.-C. (2018). Perceptions and practices of media engagement: A global perspective. International Journal on Media Management, 20(1), 1–24. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1402183
  • Christian, A. J. (2019). Expanding production value: The culture and scale of television and new media. Critical Studies in Television, 14(2), 255-267. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1749602019838882
  • CNMC, Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (2019). Estadísticas. Trimestral II 2019. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2HOEzlq
  • Costera, I. (2005). Impact or content? Ratings vs quality in public broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 20(1), 27-53. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323105049632
  • Costera, I. (2012). Valuable journalism: A search for quality from the vantage point of the user. Journalism, 14(6), 754-770. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884912455899
  • Cummins, R. G. & Chambers, T. (2011). How production value impacts perceived technical quality, credibility, an economic value of video news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 737-752. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800404
  • Daniels, R. (2017). Subscription video on demand: viewing preferences among New Zealand audiences. Master’s Thesis, Auckland University of Technology. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3fL0AOK
  • Doyle, G. (2010). From television to multi-platform: Less from more or more for less? Convergence, 16(4), 431-449. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354856510375145
  • Dunne, P. (2007). Inside American television drama: Quality is not what is produced, but what it produces. In J. McCabe & K. Akass (Eds.), Quality TV: Contemporary American television and beyond (pp. 98-110). London: IB Tauris.
  • Elliot, C. & Simmons, R. (2008). Determinants of UK box office success: The impact of quality signals. Review of Industrial Organization, 33(2), 93. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9181-0
  • Evens, T. & Donders, K. (2018). Game of screens. In T. Evens & K. Donders (Eds.), Platform power and policy in transforming television markets (pp. 47-85). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74246-5_3
  • Ericsson (2017). Ericsson consumerLab, TV and media, 2017 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JrhAxq
  • Ericsson (2015). TV media 2015 Spain consumer insights report [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3lo6NBc
  • Flores-Ruiz, Y. & Humanes-Humanes, M. L. (2014). Hábitos y consumos televisivos de la generación digital desde la perspectiva de los usos y gratificaciones. Estudio de caso en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 5(1), 137-155. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2014.5.1.06
  • Frank, R. E. & Greenberg, M. G. (2000). Interest-based segments of TV audiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6), 55-64. https://www.doi.org/10.2501/JAR-40-6-55-64
  • Fudurić, M., Malthouse, M. C. & Lee, M. (2019). Understanding the drivers of cable TV cord shaving with big data. Journal of Media Business Studies, 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1701363
  • Funk, J. L. (2004). Mobile disruption: The technologies and applications that are driving the mobile internet. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.
  • Greenberg, B. S. & Busselle, R. (1996). Audience dimensions of quality in situation comedies and action programmes. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 169-196). Luton: University of Luton Press.
  • Guerrero, E. (2018). La fuga de los millennials de la televisión lineal. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 73, 1231-1246. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1304
  • Guerrero, E., Diego, P. & Kimber, D. (2017). Hooked on lit screens. El Profesional de la Información, 26(6), 1108-1117. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.nov.10
  • Guerrero, E. & Etayo, C. (2015). Percepción de calidad de los programas de entretenimiento televisivos en España: influencia de los valores de producción. El Profesional de la Información, 24(3), 256-264. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.may.05
  • Guerrero, E., González, C. & Kimber, D. (2018). Millennials’ TV: An approach to their viewing habits. Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 59, 121-138. https://www.doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3151
  • Gunter, B. (1997). An audience-based approach to assessing program quality. In P. Winterhoff-Spurk & T. H. A. van der Voort (Eds.), New horizons in media psychology (pp. 11-34). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10899-3_2
  • Gunter, B. (1993). The audience & quality in television broadcasting. Media Information Australia, 70(1), 53-60. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X9307000108
  • Gunter, B. & Wober, M. (1992). The reactive viewer. A review of research on audience reaction measurement. London: John Libbey & Company Ltd.
  • Gutiérrez, Ch. (2000). Televisión y calidad: perspectivas de investigación y criterios de evaluación. Zer, 5(9), 151-184. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/17445
  • Ha L. & Hu X. (2013). Social media involvement among college students and general population: Implications to media management. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Mühl-Benninghaus (Eds.), Handbook of social media management. Media business and innovation (pp. 751-773). Berlin: Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_44
  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Snyderman, B. B. (1967). The motivation to work. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Hill, A., Steemers, J., Roscoe, J., Donovan, J. & Wood, D. (2017). Media industries and engagement: A dialogue across industry and academia. Media Industries, 4(1), 1–12. https://www.doi.org/10.3998/mij.15031809.0004.108
  • Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S. & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149-165. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
  • IAB Spain (2021). Estudio anual de video online 2021 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3tlgckW
  • IAB Spain (2018). Estudio anual video online 2018 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/37iarb0
  • Jarvey, N. (2019, January 17). Netflix grows subscriber base to 139 million worldwide. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36k8qvx
  • Jenner, M. (2017). Binge-watching: Video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(3), 304-320. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1367877915606485
  • Katz, B. (2018). Disney will remove more of its content from Netflix –how long before it’s all gone? Observer. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/37nJvXa
  • Killen, H. (2013, June 24). TV is changing form, but viewers still want quality, curated content. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/33qm9io
  • Kimber, D. (2019). Desarrollo y validación de tres escalas para medir la calidad de los productos televisivos. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Navarra.
  • Kuyucu, M. (2015). TV broadcasting in Turkey. The Turkish television audience in the frame of Uses and Gratification approach. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 1(4), 289-312. https://www.doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.1-4-4
  • Labrecque, L. I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P. & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257-269. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.002
  • Landgraf, J. (2018). Foreword. In A. D. Lotz (Author), We now disrupt this broadcast (pp. ix-xii). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Leggatt, T. (1996). Quality in television: The views of the professionals. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 145-168). Luton: John Libbey/University of Luton Press.
  • Maurer, T. (2017). Quality. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (vol. 30, pp. 1-8). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3qd1rN2
  • Maurer, T. (2017). Quality. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, &
  • L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell-ICA interna-
  • tional encyclopedias of communication: The interna-
  • tional encyclopedia of media effects (Vol. 30, pp. 1–8).
  • Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • Maurer, T. (2017). Quality. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, &
  • L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell-ICA interna-
  • tional encyclopedias of communication: The interna-
  • tional encyclopedia of media effects (Vol. 30, pp. 1–8).
  • Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • Maurer, T. (2017). Quality. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, &
  • L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell-ICA interna-
  • tional encyclopedias of communication: The interna-
  • tional encyclopedia of media effects (Vol. 30, pp. 1–8).
  • Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • McCabe, J. & Akass, K. (2007). Quality TV: Contemporary American television and beyond. London: IB Tauris.
  • McGovern, G. (2001). Content builds brands online. International Journal on Media Management, 3(4), 198-201. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241270109389968
  • Medina, M. (2017). Entertaining power. Quality of content. In M. Medina, M. Herrero & A. Urgellés (Eds.), Current and emerging issues in the audiovisual industry (pp. 77-96). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/9781119384632.ch6
  • Medina, M. (2006). Calidad y contenidos audiovisuales. Pamplona: EUNSA.
  • Medina, M. & Ojer, T. (2009). Valoración del servicio público de televisión. Comparación entre la BBC y TVE. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64, 275-299. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-64-2009-823-275-299
  • Mir, A., Errázuriz, I., Kimber, D. & Santa María, I. (2008). Quality index in Chilean open television. Journal of Spanish Language Media, 1, 44-67. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36hVnKY
  • Mooney, G., Burdon, S. & Kang, K. (2018). That’s entertainment: Crafting a creative ecology within public television. International Journal on Media Management, 20(4), 263-276. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2018.1557191
  • Mulgan, G. (1990). The question of quality: The broadcasting debate Nº 6. London: British Film Institute.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2012). Audience evolution and the future of audience research. International Journal on Media Management, 14(2), 79-97. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2012.675753
  • Nielsen (2019). Video on demand report [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JaCTnb
  • Nieto, A. & Iglesias, F. (2000). Empresa informativa. 2nd Ed. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Nissen, K. (2016, August 1). Video cord-cutting an international trend [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2VdwWrS
  • Pérez-Latre, F. J. & Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2015). Fundamental for the transformation of media companies in the digital age. In M. Herrero & S. Wildman (Eds.), The Business of media: Change and challenges. (pp. 53-62). Porto: Mediaxxi-Formalpress.
  • Richeri, G. & Lasagni, M. C. (2006). Televisión y calidad. La investigación internacional. Buenos Aires: La Crujia.
  • Sánchez-Tabernero, A. (2006). La medición de la calidad, instrumento de gestión de las empresas audiovisuales. In La ética y el derecho en la producción y el consumo de entretenimiento. (pp. 59-82). Valencia: Fundación Coso de la Comunidad Valenciana. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3fMfCDT
  • Schlütz, D. M. (2016). Contemporary quality TV. The entertainment experience of complex serial narratives. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook 40 (pp. 95-124). New York: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735257
  • Seawright, K. W. & Young, S. T. (1996). A quality definition continuum. Interfaces, 26(3), 107-113. https://www.doi.org/10.1287/inte.26.3.107
  • Shade, D. D., Kornfield, S. & Oliver, M. B. (2015). The uses and gratifications of media migration: Investigating the activities, motivations, and predictors of migration behaviors originating in entertainment television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 318-341. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029121
  • Shamir, J. (2007). Quality assessment of television programs in Israel: can viewers recognize production value? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 320-341. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434406
  • Tseng, M. M., Jiao, R.. J. & Wang, C. (2010). Design for mass personalization. CIRP Annals, 59(1), 175-178. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.097
  • Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2014). News quality from the recipient’s perspective. Investigating recipient’s ability to judge the normative quality of news. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 821-840. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.856670
  • Vallejo, F. & Villena, A. (2015). La audiencia no los es todo. Cuota de pantalla frente a calidad percibida: una propuesta metodológica. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 21(2), 1275-1293. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2015.v21.n2.50915
  • Verhoeven, M., von Rimscha, M. B., Krebs, I., Siegert, G. & Sommer, C. (2017). Identifying paths to audience success of media products: The media decision-makers’ perspective. International Journal on Media Management, 20(1), 51-77. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1402019
  • Von Rimscha, M. B., De Acevedo, M. & Siegert, G. (2010). Securing quality in public service television entertainment. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2(10), 7–25. https://www.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-38884
  • Wong, C. H., Tan, G. W. H., Hew, T. S. & Ooi, K. B. (2016). Can mobile TV be a new revolution in the television industry? Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 764-776. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.021
  • Zenith (2018). Media consumption forecasts 2018 [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36khC2X
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet