A Moral Reading of Argentine Constitutional Case Law

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALEXY, ROBERT, The Argument From Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Litschewski Paulson, B., and Paulson, Stanley, L., (transl.), Oxford University Press, 2002.
• BREEN, JOHN M. - SCAPERLANDA, MICHAEL A., «Never Get out the Boat. Stenberg vs. Carhart and the Future of American Law», Connecticut Law Review, 39 (2006).
• FINNIS, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford University Press, 2nd. Edition, 2011.
• FINNIS, J., Introduction, in: (J. Finnis comp.), Natural Law, Darmouth 1991, Volume I.
• FISH, STANLEY, «Working on the Chain Gang», Texas Law Review, 60 (1982).
• FISH, STANLEY, «Wrong Again», Texas Law Review, 62 (1983).
• CIANCIARDO, J., El principio de razonabilidad. Del debido proceso sustantivo al moderno juicio de proporcionalidad, 2da. Edición, Ábaco, Buenos Aires.
• DWORKIN, RONALD, Justices for Hedgeghos, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2011.
• DWORKIN, RONALD, Justice in Robes, Cambridge Mass., 2006.
• Dworkin, RONALD, Response to Overseas Commentators», International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1 (2003).
• DWORKIN, RONALD Freedom´s Law. The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
• DWORKIN, RONALD, Law’s Empire, Harvard University Press, New York 1986.
• Dworkin, RONALD, «My Reply to Stanley Fish (and Walter Benn Michaels): Please Don't Talk About Objectivity Any More», in The Politics of Interpretation, (W.J.T. Mitchell ed.), 1983.
• DWORKIN, RONALD, Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, London 1977.
• MARMOR, ANDREI, Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Clarendon Press, 1995.
• PATTERSON, DENNIS, «Interpretation in Law», San Diego Law Review, 42 (2005).
• PEAT, DANIEL, and WINDSOR, MATTHEW, «Playing the Game of Interpretation», in Interpretation in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015.
• RABBI - BALDI CABANILLAS, R., «Consideraciones sobre el sentido de la norma permisiva y prospectivas desde una filosofía del derecho constitucional, a partir del caso ‘F., A. L.’ de la Corte Suprema», Pensar en Derecho, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad
• de Buenos Aires, 1 (2012).
• RAZ, JOSPEH, «About Morality and the Nature of Law», American Journal of Jurisprudence, 43 (2003).
• SADOWSKI, M., «Language is not Life», Connecticut Law Review, 33 (2001).
• WEINRIB, JACOB, Dimensions of Dignity. The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
• WROBLEWSKI, JERZY, «Legal Language and Legal Interpretation», Law and Philosophy, 4 (1985).
• WRÒBLESKI, JERZY; MAC CORMICK, NEIL, «On Justification and Interpretation», ARSP-Beiheft, 53 (1994).
• ZAMBRANO, PILAR, Understanding Human Dignity, or Saving Dignity from Ockam´s Razor, Jurisprudence, Hurt Publications, 2016, 8-1, 143-155.
• ZAMBRANO, PILAR, «Fundamental Principles, Realist Semantics and Human Action», Rechtstheorie, 46 (2015).
• ZAMBRANO, P., SACRISTÁN, E., «El derecho a la vida y el aborto en la Constitución Argentina», Tratado de Derechos fundamentales, (LEGARRE, S., RIVERA, J., eds.), La Ley, 2014, 655-701.
• ZAMBRANO, P., SACRISTÁN, E., «Semantics and Legal Interpretation. A Comparative Study of the Value of Embryonic life under Argentine and U.S. Constitutional Case law», Journal of Civil Law Studies, 6-1 (2013).
• ZAMBRANO, PILAR, La inevitable creatividad en la interpretación jurídica. Una aproximación iusfilosófica a la tesis de la discrecionalidad, UNAM, México, 2009.