¿Hacia una responsabilidad objetiva del Estado que «no puede» combatir el terrorismo internacional?

  1. Cocchini, Andrea
Revista:
Anuario español de derecho internacional

ISSN: 2173-3775

Ano de publicación: 2019

Número: 35

Páxinas: 297-331

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15581/010.35.297-331 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Anuario español de derecho internacional

Resumo

Operation Inherent resolve against ISIL in Syria has revitalised the debate on the legitimacy of the «unwilling or unable» State theory. Starting from 9/11 terrorist attacks, States’ practice has shown a growing tendency to expand the right of self-defence of Article 51 of the U.N: Charter. Thus, the present study primarily revises the first extension of self-defence that took place after 9/11 allowing its invocation against the State that shelters a terrorist group. Moreover, it analyses a second expansion of the right of self-defence based on the «unwilling or unable» theory which seems to trespass into States’ strict liability for not preventing terrorists attacks originating from their territory.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barker, B., «ISIS: Nothing New Under The Sun», Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International, vol. 20, 2014, núm. 4, pp. 10-12.
  • Bermejo García, R., «Las denominadas nuevas tendencias en la lucha contra el terrorismo internacional: el caso del Estado Islámico», en Gutiérrez Espada, C.; Cervell Hortal, M. J. (eds.), El Estado Islámico (Daesh). ¿Aprenderemos la lección?, Valencia, Tirant Lo Blanch, 2018, pp. 149-223.
  • Bethlehem, D., «Self-defense against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors», American Journal of International Law, vol. 106, 2012, pp. 769-777.
  • Brunnée, J.; Toope, S. J., «Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Are Powerful States Willing But Unable To Change International Law?», International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 67, 2018, núm. 2, pp. 263-286.
  • Casanovas, O.; Rodrigo, Á. J., Compendio de Derecho internacional público, Madrid, Tecnos, 2017.
  • Cervell Hortal, M. J., «Sobre la doctrina «Unwilling or Unable State» (¿Podría el fin justificar los medios?)», REDI, vol. 70, 2018, núm. 1, pp. 77-100.
  • Corten, O., «The ‘Unwilling or Unable’ Test: Has it Been, and Could it be, Accepted?», Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 29, 2016, pp. 777-799.
  • Couzigou, I., «The Fight against the ‘Islamic State’ in Syria: Towards the Modification of the Right to Self-Defence?», Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, vol. 9, 2017, núm. 2, pp. 80-106.
  • — «The Right to Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors – Criteria of the ‘Unwilling or Unable’ Test», en Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 77, 2017, núms. 1-2, pp. 53-55.
  • Deeks, A. S., «Unwilling or Unable: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense», Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 52, 2012, pp. 483-550.
  • Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • Dominicé, C., «La société internationale à la recherche de son équilibre», Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, vol. 370, 2013, pp. 29-392.
  • Echeverría Jesús, C., «El Estado Islámico (EI) como grupo terrorista yihadista salafista y otros grupos armados violentos actuando en Irak hoy», Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos, Documento de investigación, núm. 6, 2014, pp. 1-15.
  • Gutiérrez Espada, C., «Sobre la prohibición del uso de la fuerza armada en los últimos setenta años (1945-2015)», en Pons Rafols, X . (ed.), Las Naciones Unidas desde España: 70 aniversario de las Naciones Unidas. 60 aniversario del ingreso de España en las Naciones Unidas, Barcelona, Asociación para las Naciones Unidas en España, 2015, pp. 125-150.
  • International Law Association, Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Tim Stephens (Rapporteur), Second Report, July 2016, pp. 1-48.
  • Lubell, N., Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.
  • Moir, L., «Action Against Host States of Terrorist Groups», en Well er, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 1-22.
  • — Reappraising the Resort to Force: International Law, Jus ad Bellum and the War on Terror, Hart Publishing, Portland, 2010.
  • Oellers-Frahm, K., «Article 51 – What Matters Is the Armed Attack, not the Attacker», en Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 77, 2017, núms. 1-2, pp. 49-51.
  • Pozo Serrano, P., «El uso de la fuerza contra el Estado Islámico en Irak y Siria: problemas de fundamentación jurídica», Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, vol. 32, 2016, pp. 141-188.
  • — La guerra de Af-Pakistán y el uso de la fuerza en las relaciones internacionales, Pamplona, Eunsa, 2011.
  • Proulx, V. J., «Babysitting Terrorists: Should States Be Strictly Liable for Failing to Prevent Transborder Attacks», Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 23, 2005, núm. 3, pp. 615- 668.
  • Rooney, M., «El ‘Estado Islámico’: la ruta a la autoproclamación de un califato contemporáneo», Agenda Internacional, vol. 34, 2016, pp. 49-76.
  • Roscini, M., «Neighborhood Watch? The African Great Lakes Pact and ius ad bellum», Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 69, 2009, núm. 4, pp. 931-959.
  • Scharf, M. P., «How the War against ISIS Changed International Law», Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol. 48, 2016, pp. 15-67.
  • Starski, P., «Right to Self-Defense, Attribution and the Non-State Actor – Birth of the ‘Unable or Unwilling’ Standard?», Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 75, 2015, núm. 3, pp. 455-501.
  • The Chatham House, «Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence », Int’l & Comp. L.Q., vol. 55, 2006, núm. 4, pp. 963-972.
  • Trapp, K., «Back to Basics: Necessity, Proportionality, and the Right of Self-Defence against Non-State Terrorist Actors», International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 56, 2007, núm. 1, pp. 141-156.
  • — «Can Non-State Actors Mount an Armed Attack?», en Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law, 2016, pp. 680-696.
  • Tsagourias, N., «Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: The Interaction between Self- Defence as a Primary Rule and Self-Defence as a Secondary Rule», Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 29, 2016, núm. 3, pp. 801-825.
  • Wood, M., «Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors – A Practitioner’s View», en Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, vol. 77, 2017, núms. 1-2, pp. 75-77.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet