Aportación de Teoría de la mente de la Batería NEPSY-II como medida de Coherencia central

  1. Crespo-Eguílaz, Nerea 1
  2. Gambra Echeverría, Leyre 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200,  2172-3427

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 18

Número: 3

Páxinas: 277-288

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.35869/REINED.V18I3.3267 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de investigación en educación

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Introduction The aim of this research is to analyze the clinical utility of the “Theory of Mind” (TM) subtest of NEPSY-II (Korkman et al., 2014). Methodology TM was applied to 244 school aged children with normal intelligence: a control group (n=194) and clinical groups (n=50): ASD-grade 1 (n= 10); procedural learning disorder (PLD, n=24); and ADHD (n=16). Results and Discussion We do a examination of the factorial structure through a exploratory (KMO=0.62 and MSA=0,54-0,75) and confirmatory (χ =22,75 p=0,504; TLI=1,04; CFI=1; RMSEA=0) analyses. The 21 items of the TM. 3 factors are obtained that explain 62% of the total variance: Theory of mind (items 1/2/7); Social stories comprehension (items 5/8/10/14) and Contextual coherence (items 9/12 / 16-21). The descriptive statistics are provided from the calculation of validity and reliability. None of the groups differ in the first two factors (U-mann-Whitney). In Contextual coherence, the PLD group and the control groups (p=,001) differed significantly of the ASD group (p=,025). The difficulties in understanding information in a quick and simultaneous way and integrating it coherently have been shown to be part of the neuropsychological profile of the PLD. Conclusión Our study provide a new correction an interpretation of the TM that evalautes Central coherence.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. y Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have theory of mind? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
  • Berenguer, C. y Roselló, B. (2016). El valor de la Teoría de la Mente en la diferenciación de niños con TDAH y con TEA. En J.L. Castejón (Ed.), Psicología y educación: Presente y futuro(pp. 690-699). Madrid, ACIPE-Asociación Científica de Piscología y Educación
  • Bishop, D.V.M. (1998). Development of the Children ́s Communication Checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and allied disciplines, 39(6), 879-891.
  • Bishop, D.V.M. (2003). The Children ́s Communication Checklist second edition (CCC- 2). Londres: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Brent, E., Rios, P., Happé, F. y Charman, T. (2004). Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks. Autism, 8, 283-299.
  • Browne, M.W. y Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445-455.
  • Bryne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos. Basic concepts, applications and programming (2a ed.). Nueva York: Routlege-Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Cardillo, R., Garcia, R.B., Mammarella, I.C. y Cornoldi, C. (2018). Pragmatics of language and theory of mind in children with dyslexia with associated language difficulties or nonverbal learning disabilities. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7(3), 245-256.
  • Cornoldi, C., Fine, J. y Mammarella, I. C. (2016). Nonverbal learning disability. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Gambra, L., Miguéliz, M., Luna, A., Ruiz, J., Abete, A., Ramos, E., Vergara, M. y Reyes, C. (22-24 de abril de 2020-aplazado). El análisis pormenorizado del Chilhood asperger síndrome test permite diferenciar subtipos clínicos. Comunicación oral. 8th International congress of educational sciences and development. Palacio de Congresos de Pontevedra, España.
  • Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Magallón, S., Sánchez-Carpintero, R. y Narbona, J. (2016). La adaptación al castellano de la Children ́s Communication Checklist permite detectar las dificultades en el uso pragmático del lenguaje y diferenciar subtipos clínicos. Revista de Neurología, 62(Supl 1), 49-57.
  • Crespo-Eguílaz, N. y Narbona, J. (2009). Trastorno de aprendizaje procedimental: características neuropsicológicas. Revista de Neurología, 49(8), 409-416.
  • Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Narbona, J. y Magallón, S. (2012). Disfunción de la coherencia central en niños con trastorno de aprendizaje procedimental. Revista de Neurología, 55(9), 513-519.
  • Doty, N. (2019). Nonverbal Learning Disability. En: H. Wilson y E. Braaten (Eds.), The Massachusetts General Hospital Guide to Learning Disabilities. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Boston: Humana Press.
  • Drummond, C.R., Ahmad, S.A. y Rourke, B.P. (2005). Rules for the classification of younger children with nonverbal learning disabilities and basic phonological processing disabilities. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(2), 171-182.
  • Gambra, L. (2020). Coherencia central: diseño y validación de una prueba de evaluación y estudio en el trastorno de aprendizaje procedimental (Tesis doctoral). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
  • Happé, F. y Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5-25.
  • Hu, L. y Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. En R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Jolliffe, T.y Baron‐Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the Embedded Figures Test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 527-534.
  • Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4.a ed.). Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
  • Korkman, M., Kirk, U. y Kemp, S. (2014). NEPSY-II: Manual clínico y de interpretación. España: Pearson, The Psychological Corporation.
  • Mammarella, I.C., Coltri, S., Lucangeli, D. y Cornoldi, C. (2009). Impairment of simultaneous-spatial working memory in nonverbal (visuospatial) learning disability: A treatment case study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19(5), 761-780.
  • Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B. y Burack, J.A. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 27-43.
  • Raven, J.C. (2001). Test de matrices progresivas. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Rinehart, N.J., Bradshaw, J.L., Moss, S.A., Brereton, A.V. y Tonge, B.J. (2000). Atypical interference of local detail on global processing in high-functioning autism and Asperger's disorder. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(6), 769-778.
  • Sans, A., Colomé, R., López-Sala, A. y Boix, C. (2009). Trastorno de aprendizaje no verbal: características cognitivo-conductuales y aspectos neuropsicológicos.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. y Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  • Scott, F.J., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P. y Brayne, C. (2002). The CAST (Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test) Preliminary development of a UK screen for mainstream primary-school-age children. Autism, 6(1), 9-31.
  • Semrud-Clikeman, M., Walkowiak, J., Wilkinson, A.y Christopher, G. (2010). Neuropsychological differences among children with Asperger syndrome, nonverbal learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, and controls. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(5), 582-600.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet