Satisfacción con la simulación clínica de alta fidelidad en reanimación cardio-pulmonar durante la Covid-19

  1. Chalezquer, Mª Ángeles Guillén 1
  2. Regaira Martínez, Elena 2
  3. Vázquez Calatayud, Mónica 3
  1. 1 Área de Críticos
  2. 2 Área de Desarrollo Profesional de Enfermería; Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona, España
  3. 3 Área de Desarrollo Profesional de Enfermería; Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona, España. IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra. Pamplona, España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

ISSN: 1132-1296

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 31

Número: 2

Páginas: 77-81

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

Resumen

Objective: To assess the satisfaction of novel nurses with high-fidelity clinical simulation in CPR training, during Covid-19. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive observational study. Satisfaction Scale in High Fidelity Clinical Simulation was used, a validated 33-item questionnaire with a Likert-type response. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric inferential statistics (Spearman's correlation) were used to analyze the correlation between the variables. Results: N = 35 (100%). The mean overal satisfaction was 4.97 ± 0.17. The items related to the adequacy of the cases to the knowledge of the participants, the ability to provide care to patients, the benefit of simulation and the impact on improving their technical skills were the best scored (mean of 4.97). A positive and strong relationship was found between items: 4-9, and 27-9 (rho = 0.804; p = 0.000). Conclusions: Satisfaction level of novel nurses with the high-fidelity clinical simulation was high, confirming its usefulness in the CPR learning process during Covid-19 or pandemic outbreaks of the same nature.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alconero-Camarero, AR; Romero, AG; Sarabia-Cobo, CM; Arce, AM. Clinical simulation as a learning tool in undergraduate nursing: Validation of a questionnaire. Nurse Educ Today 2016; 39: 128-34. https://doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.027.
  • Alconero-Camarero, AR; Sarabia Cobo, CM; González-Gómez, S; Ibáñez-Rementería, I; Alvarez-García, MP. Descriptive study of the satisfaction of nursing degree students in high-fidelity clinical simu-lation practices. Enferm Clin 2020; 30: 404-410. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019. 07.007.
  • Batllori Gastón, M. Clinical simulation and the COVID-19 pandemic. Where do we come from? Where do we want to go? An Sist Sanit Navar 2020; 43: 125-129. Doi: https://doi: 10.23938/ ASSN.0887.
  • Benner, P. From novice to expert. Am J Nurs. 1982; (3): 402–407.
  • Calamassi, D; Nannelli, T; Guazzini, A; Rasero, L; Bambi, S. High Fidelity Simulation Experience in Emergency settings: doctors and nurses satisfaction levels. Acta Biomed 2016; 87: 38-50.
  • Cant, RP; Cooper, SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 49: 63-71. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j. nedt.2016.11.015.
  • Da Silva Garcia Nascimento, J; Gonçalves Do Nascimento, K; Gouvêa de Oliveira, JL; Goulart Alves, M; Da Silva, AR; Barcellos Dalri, CM. Simulación clínica para desarrollar competencias en enfermería de la resucitación cardiopulmonar: revisión sistemática. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/ 1518-8345.4094.3391.
  • Díaz Agea, JL; Pujalte-Jesús, MJ; Leal Costa, C. Simular en tiempos de confinamiento. Cómo transformar la simulación clínica a un formato online en un contexto universitario de Ciencias de la Salud. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar 2020; 43 Doi: https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0865
  • Dufrene, C; Young, A. Successful debriefing – best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: A literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34: 372-376. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j.nedt. 2013.06.026.
  • Ercília Chagas, RM; Pereira-Ávila, FMY; Garcia Bezerra, GF; Pereira-Caldeira, NMV; Sousa Laelson, RM; De Carvalho, E; Lemos GM. Positive and negative aspects of clinical simulation in nursing teaching. Esc. Anna Nery. 2020. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S1414-81452020000300207&lng=en [acceso: 20/09/2021].
  • Góes, FSN; Jackman, D. Development of an instructor guide tool: ‘Three Stages of Holistic De-briefing’ Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020; 28: e3229. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/ scie-lo.php?pid=S0104-11692020000100301&scri pt=sci_arttext&tlng=es [acceso: 20/09/2021].
  • Hanshaw, SL; Dickerson, SS. High fidelity simulation evaluation studies in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract 2020; 46: 102818. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020. 102818.
  • Huang, J; Tang, Y; Tang, J; Shi, J; et al. Educa-tional efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19:323. Doi: https://doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1763-z.
  • Jiménez-Rodríguez, D; Arrogante, O. Simulated Video Consultations as a Learning Tool in Undergrad-uate Nursing: Students' Perceptions. Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8: 280. Doi: https:/doi: 10.3390/ healthcare8030280.
  • La Cerra, C; Dante, A; Caponnetto, V; Franconi, I; et al. Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 22: 9:e025306. Doi: https://doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306.
  • Lapkin, S; Fernandez, R; Levett-Jones, T; Bell-chambers, H. The effectiveness of using human patient simulation manikins in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2010; 8: 661-694. Doi: https//doi: 10.11124/ 01938924-201008160-00001.
  • Ligeti Stuardo, P; Fasce Henry, E; Veliz-Rojas, L. Aprendizaje autodirigido y motivación académica en estudiantes de enfermería de una universidad en Chile. Index de Enfermería 2020; 29(1-2): 74-8. Disponible en: http://ciberindex.com/c/ie/e12470 [acceso: 21/06/2022].
  • Manual de Soporte Vital Básico con Desfibrilador Externo Automatizado (DEA) (ERC-CERCP). Edición 2015. Disponible en: https://cosy.erc.edu/ es/webshop [acceso: 10/03/2021].
  • Mccoy, CE; Rahman, A; Rendon, JC; Anderson, CL; et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs. Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. West J Emerg Med 2019; 20: 15-22. Doi: https://doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.11.39040.
  • Mcrae, ME; Chan, A; Hulett, R; Lee, AJ; Cole-man, B. The effectiveness of and satisfaction with high-fidelity simulation to teach cardiac surgical resuscitation skills to nurses. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2017; 40:64-69. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.11.001.
  • Mould, J; White, H; Gallagher, R. Evaluation of a critical care simulation series for undergraduate nursing students. Contemp Nurse 2011; 38:180-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2011.38.1-2.180
  • Parker, BC; Myrick, F. A critical examination of high-fidelity human patient simulation within the context of nursing pedagogy. Nurse Educ Today 2009; 29: 322-9. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/ j.nedt.2008.10.012.
  • Raurell-Torredà, M; Gómez-Ibañez, R; miembros grupo GRISCA (Grup Recerca en Simulació a Cata-lunya i Andorra). High-fidelity simulation: Who has the most impressive laboratory? Enferm Intensiva 2017; 28: 45-47. Doi: https://doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2017.04.001.
  • Recomendaciones para la docencia en RCP del European Resucitation Council. Disponible en: https://www.cercp.org/images/stories/recursos/Doc umentos/Guias_ERC_COVID19_traducion_oficial _CERCP.pdf [acceso: 10/03/2021]
  • Zapro, KA; Ferranto, MLG, Blasiman, R; Sheles-tak, D. Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and sefl-conbfidence in simulation: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today 2018; 60:28-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017. 09.006.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet