Visual strategies of sustainability communication on corporate webpages. A critical multimodal discourse analysis in the hospitality sector

  1. Ana María Fernández Vallejo
Revista:
Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

ISSN: 1139-7241,  2340-2784

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 45

Páginas: 109-137

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17398/2340-2784.45.109 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

Resumen

Tomando como marco de estudio la comunicación corporativa digital, el análisis del discurso multimodal y las teorías de legitimación y relevancia, este trabajo analiza cómo las cadenas hoteleras utilizan los recursos visuales para representar sus estrategias de sostenibilidad en sus sitios web. El análisis del corpus incluye330 imágenes (fotografías y logos) de las cinco cadenas hoteleras más sostenibles según Sustainability Yearbook 2022. Estas imágenes se han descargado manualmente de los sitios web corporativos en inglés y, en concreto, de las secciones relacionadas con la sostenibilidad. El procedimiento de investigación, desde una perspectiva cuantitativa y cualitativa, responde a las siguientes preguntas: “¿qué ve el espectador?” (Q1), “¿qué representan las imágenes en relación con las cuatro dimensiones de sostenibilidad?” (Q2) y “¿cómo se utilizan dichos elementos visuales para transmitir las diferentes dimensiones de la sostenibilidad?” (Q3). Los resultados obtenidos muestran que las cadenas hoteleras prefieren fotografías de personas para evocar la dimensión humana; las fotografías de la naturaleza, que serían las más esperables, solo alcanzan el tercer lugar. Dado que la comunicación de la sostenibilidad es un área de investigación compleja, la contribución de este trabajo es doble: por un lado, pretende ser una aportación a los estudios de comunicación de la sostenibilidad desde una perspectiva multimodal; por otro, tiene como objetivo presentar una herramienta metodológica para analizar críticamente el discurso de la sostenibilidad como práctica discursiva digital multimodal.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alibašić, H. (2017). Measuring the sustainability impact in local governments using the quadruple bottom line. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice, 13(3), 37. http://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v13i03/37 -45
  • Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image. In. S. Heath (Ed.), Image-Music-Text (pp. 32-51). Fontana.
  • Bateman, J. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. Routledge.
  • Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10-34). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062
  • Biloslavo, R., & Trnavčevič, A. (2009). Web sites as tools of communication of a “green” company. Management Decision, 47 (7), 1158-1173. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978359
  • Bögel, P. M. (2015). Processing of CSR communication: insights from the ELM. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013- 0095
  • Breeze, R. (2012). Legitimation in corporate discourse: Oil corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse & Society, 23(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511
  • Breeze, R. (2021). Understandable public anger: Legitimation in banking after the 2008 crisis. Pragmatics, 31(4), 483-508. https://doi.org/10. 1075/prag.20065.bre
  • Breeze, R., & Fernández-Vallejo, A. M. (2020). Comparing corporate social responsibility discourses in the letter to shareholders: The case of British and Spanish banks. ESP Today, 8(2), 250-274. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020. 8.2.4
  • Camilleri, M. A. (Ed.). (2021). Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age. Emerald.
  • Chong, S., Momin, M., & Narayan, A. (2022). A research framework to analyse visual persuasion of photographs in sustainability reports. Meditari Accountancy Research (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2022-1565
  • Chong, S., Narayan, A. K., & Ali, I. (2019). Photographs depicting CSR: captured reality or creative illusion? Pacific Accounting Review, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2017-0086
  • Chung, J., & Cho, C. H. (2018). Current trends within social and environmental accounting research: A literature review. Accounting Perspectives, 17(2), 207-239. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1911-3838.12171
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  • Confetto, M. G., & Covucci, C. (2021). A taxonomy of sustainability topics: a guide to set the corporate sustainability content on the web. The TQM Journal, 33(7), 106-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/ TQM-06-2020-0134
  • Elkington, J. (2007). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18-21.
  • Esposito, E. (2022). The visual semiotics of digital misogyny: female leaders in the viewfinder. Feminist Media Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14680777.2022.2139279
  • Feng, W. D. (2017). Metonymy and visual representation: Towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication, 16(4), 441-466. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1470357217717142
  • Fernández-Vallejo, A.M. (2023). Communicating Sustainability in Spanish hotel chains: The use of websites as a legitimation tool. Doxa Comunicación, 37. https://doi.org/10.31921/ doxacom.n37a1855
  • Fernández-Vázquez, J. S. (2021). Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: a multimodal ecolinguistic approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska a Istraživa, 34(1), 2692-2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1331677X.2020.1836993
  • Ferro, C., Padin, C., Høgevold, N., Svensson, G., & Sosa Varela, J. C. (2019). Validating and expanding a framework of a triple bottom line dominant logic for business sustainability through time and across contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(1), 95-116. https://doi. org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2017-0181
  • Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University Press
  • Foroudi, P., Melewar, T. C., & Gupta, S. (2017). Corporate logo: History, definition, and components. International Studies of Management & Organization, 47(2), 176-196. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00208825.2017.1256166
  • Freeman, R.E. (2015). Stakeholder theory. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. Choice Reviews Online, 52, 1-6.
  • García-García, M., Carrillo-Durán, M.V., & Tato Jimenez, J.L. (2017). Online corporate communications: website usability and content. Journal of Communication Management, 21(2), 140- 154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2016-0069
  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibson, K., & O’Donovan, G. (2007). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 944-956.
  • Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 24-30.
  • Guijarro, A. J. M. (2013). Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 336-352.
  • Hrasky, S. (2012). Visual disclosure strategies adopted by more and less sustainability-driven companies. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.02.001
  • Iaia, L., Vrontis, D., Maizza, A., Fait, M., Scorrano, P., and Cavallo, F. (2019). Family businesses, corporate social responsibility, and websites: The strategies of Italian wine firms in talking to stakeholders. British Food Journal, 121(7), 1442- 1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0445
  • Igboanugo, S., Yang, J., & Bigelow, P. (2022). Building a framework for an inclusive workplace culture. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 6(3), 52-67.
  • Jayanti, R. K. (2018). Sustainability based corporate identity: A study of corporate websites. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 22(3), 1- 16.
  • Kallendorf, C., & Kallendorf, C. (1985). The figures of speech, ethos, and Aristotle: Notes toward a rhetoric of business communication. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 22(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194368502200102
  • Khan, M., & Sulaiman, R. B. (2021). On the linkage between CEOs’ statements and CSR reporting: an analysis of visuals and verbal texts. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 515-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0240
  • Kim, S., & Rader, S. (2010). What they can do versus how much they care: Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500 web sites. Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 59-80.
  • KPMG. 2008. International Survey of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting 2008. http://www. kpmg.com [20 January 2023].
  • Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.
  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343-368.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453-486.
  • Llorente-Barroso, C., & García-García, F. (2015). The rhetorical construction of corporate logos. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 27(2), 289-309. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ARIS.2015.v27.n2.44 667
  • Lodhia, S. (2018). Is the medium the message? Advancing the research agenda on the role of communication media in sustainability reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0197
  • Lodhia, S., Kaur, A. and Stone, G. (2020). The use of social media as a legitimation tool for sustainability reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(4), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/ MEDAR-09-2019-0566
  • Malavasi, D. (2018). Multimodal strategies of knowledge communication in corporate social responsibility reports and sustainability webpages: A comparative analysis. In G.E. Garzone & W. Giordano (Eds.), Discourse, communication and the enterprise: Where business meets discourse (pp. 230-248). Cambridge Scholars.
  • Marchese, D., Reynolds, E., Bates, M. E., Morgan, H., Clark, S. S., & Linkov, I. (2018). Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 1275-1283.
  • Mark-Herbert, C., & Von Schantz, C. (2007). Communicating corporate social responsibility– brand management. EJBO-Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(2), 4-11.
  • Mars, L. M. (2021). The role of text and images in assessing the credibility of information. Master’s Thesis. Tilburg University.
  • Marsh, E. E., & Domas White, M. (2003). A taxonomy of relationships between images and text. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 647-672.
  • Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337-371.
  • Martínez, P., Herrero, Á., & Gómez López, R. (2019). Corporate images and customer behavioral intentions in an environmentally certified context: Promoting environmental sustainability in the hospitality industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1382-1391. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/csr.1754
  • Milanesi, M., Kyrdoda, Y., & Runfola, A. (2022). How do you depict sustainability? An analysis of images posted on Instagram by sustainable fashion companies. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 20932685.2021.1998789
  • Moyaert, H., Vangehuchten, L., & FernándezVallejo, A.M. (2021). The CRS communication strategy of Iberdrola on Facebook and Twitter: a corpus-based linguistic and content analysis. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 54, 119- 142. http://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e664
  • Palazzo, M., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2020). From strategic corporate social responsibility to value creation: An analysis of corporate website communication in the banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(7), 1529-1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0168
  • Passafaro, P. (2020). Attitudes and tourists’ sustainable behavior: An overview of the literature and discussion of some theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Travel Research, 59(4), 579-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 004728751985117
  • Phillips, J., & Hausbeck, K. (2000). Just beneath the surface: re-reading geology, re-scripting the knowledge/power nexus. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28(3), 181-202.
  • Pilař, L., Kvasničková Stanislavská, L., Pitrová, J.,Krejčí, I., Tichá, I., & Chalupová, M. (2019). (2019). Twitter analysis of global communication in the field of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(24), 6958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246958
  • Raar, J. (2007). Reported social and environmental taxonomies: a longer-term glimpse. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 840-860. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710819670
  • Rämö, H. (2011). Visualizing the phronetic organization: The case of photographs in CSR reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0916-8
  • Roxas, F. M. Y., Rivera, J. P. R., & Gutierrez, E. L. M. (2020). Mapping stakeholders’ roles in governing sustainable tourism destinations. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020. 09.005
  • S&P Global (2023). Sustainability Yearbook 2022. https://www.spglobal.com/esg/csa/yearbook/2022/ ranking/ [25 January 2023].
  • Sánchez-Chaparro, T., Soler-Vicén, M. A., & Gómez-Frías, V. (2022). Be good and look good: Communicating the triple bottom line through corporate websites. Journal of Business Research, 144, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2022.01.089
  • Saussure, F. M. (2011). Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press.
  • Schleifer, P. (2019). Varieties of multi-stakeholder governance: selecting legitimation strategies in transnational sustainability politics. Globalizations, 16(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731. 2018.1518863
  • Simões, C., Dibb, S, & Fisk, R. (2005). Managing corporate identity: an internal perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 153- 158.
  • Sossini, L., Santi, R., & Del Curto, B. (2022). The Colours of Sustainability: how materials CMF Design can guide sustainable perceptions and behaviours. In A. Siniscalco (Ed.), Colour and Colorimetry. Multidisciplinary Contributions (pp. 277-284). Gruppo del Colore & Associazione Italiana Colore.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet