Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges
- 1 Applied Mechanics Department, CEIT, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 15, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain
ISSN: 1687-9600, 1687-9619
Año de publicación: 2011
Volumen: 2011
Páginas: 759764
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Robotics
Resumen
This paper presents a survey of existing robotic systems for lower-limb rehabilitation. It is a general assumption that robotics will play an important role in therapy activities within rehabilitation treatment. In the last decade, the interest in the field has grown exponentially mainly due to the initial success of the early systems and the growing demand caused by increasing numbers of stroke patients and their associate rehabilitation costs. As a result, robot therapy systems have been developed worldwide for training of both the upper and lower extremities. This work reviews all current robotic systems to date for lower-limb rehabilitation, as well as main clinical tests performed with them, with the aim of showing a clear starting point in the field. It also remarks some challenges that current systems still have to meet in order to obtain a broad clinical and market acceptance.
Referencias bibliográficas
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666
- (1981), The British Medical Journal, 282, pp. 517, 10.1136/bmj.282.6263.517
- (1993), Stroke, 24, pp. 1186, 10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1186
- 10.1186/1743-0003-4-2
- (1987)
- 10.1191/0269215506cr930oa
- (1995), European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, pp. 823, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00686.x
- 10.1310/DAMJ-G43A-16EH-1BDK
- (2000), Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37, pp. 693
- 10.1038/sj.sc.3101154
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004
- (2005), Physical Therapy, 85, pp. 52, 10.1093/ptj/85.1.52
- 10.1177/1545968308326632
- 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18
- 10.1080/02699050801941771
- 10.2340/16501977-0422
- 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0073
- 10.1109/TBME.2007.910683
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2008280
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903919
- (2000), Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37, pp. 701
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6
- (2007), Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, pp. 17, 10.1177/0269215506071281
- 10.2340/16501977-0304
- 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.06.004
- 10.1109/TMECH.2010.2040834
- 10.1186/1743-0003-7-6
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2015179
- 10.1023/A:1008938121020
- 10.1162/1054746011470262
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891384
- 10.1177/0278364909104221
- 10.1109/TMECH.2009.2036170
- 10.1163/016918610X493534
- 10.1023/B:AURO.0000016866.80026.d7
- (2008), Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 28, pp. 79
- 10.1310/6GL4-UM7X-519H-9JYD
- (1997), Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 34, pp. 203
- 10.1016/S0957-4158(00)00017-9
- 10.1109/MEMB.2008.919498
- 10.1186/1743-0003-7-23
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.823266
- (2009), Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6, pp. 23, 10.1186/1743-0003-6-23
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.004
- (1999), Stroke, 30, pp. 1538, 10.1161/01.STR.30.8.1538