El discurso político de Podemosla construcción de una identidad

  1. Casado-Velarde, Manuel 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Zeitschrift:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación
  1. Fernández Ulloa, Teresa (coord.)

ISSN: 1576-4737

Datum der Publikation: 2019

Titel der Ausgabe: The Rhetoric of Persuasion

Nummer: 80

Seiten: 177-190

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5209/CLAC.66606 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Zusammenfassung

This article deals with the study about how the Spanish political party Podemos constructs its identity discursively, and tries to answer the question about whether it can be qualified as a populist in the strict sense. The corpus on which the investigation is based is constituted by the "Political document" of Podemos, available on the party's website. After a description of the linguistic features of that text, with particular emphasis on those of lexical-semantic character (with some relevant quantitative and statistical data), the discursive resources used to build the identity of the party are highlighted. The next step is to compare the characterizing features of Podemos's discourse with those provided by other recent studies on populist parties, to conclude that Podemos represents a political party with a clearly populist profile.

Informationen zur Finanzierung

El autor desea expresar el reconocimiento a la ayuda del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO), a través del proyecto de investigación “DEMOS: Imagining the people in the new politics” (Ref. FFI2015-65252-R), desarrollado en el ámbito de “El discurso público”, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad de la Universidad de Navarra.

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Álvarez Tardío, Manuel y Javier Redondo Rodelas (Dirs.) (2019), Podemos. Cuando lo nuevo se hace viejo, Madrid, Tecnos.
  • Breeze, Raffaella (2017), “Deconstruyendo el populismo del siglo XXI”, en Nuevas tendencias, Empresa y Humanismo, Universidad de Navarra, nº 98, julio, 2-7.
  • Breeze, Ruth (2011), “Critical discourse analysis and its critics”, Pragmatics, 21:4, 493-525.
  • Breeze, Ruth (2019), “Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour”. Discourse & Society, 30 (1), 24-43.
  • Charaudeau, Patrick, (2009), “Reflexiones para el análisis del discurso populista”, Discurso y Sociedad (en línea).
  • De Cleen, Benjamin & Yannis Stavrakakis (2017): “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism”, Javnost - The Public. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 1-19.
  • Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz (2018), Tiempos de hipérbole, Valencia, Tirant Lo Blanch.
  • Ionescu, Ghita y Gellner, Ernest (1969), Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics, Macmillan, Nueva York.
  • Laclau, Ernesto (1977), Política e ideología en la teoría marxista: capitalismo, fascismo, populismo, Siglo XXI Editores, Madrid.
  • Moffitt, Benjamin (2016), The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford, California : Stanford University Press.
  • Montesano Montessori, Nicolina y Esperanza Morales López (2019), “The articulation of ‘the people’ in the discourse of Podemos”, en Zienkowski and Breeze (eds.) (2019),123-147.
  • Moreno Fernández, Francisco (2014), Spanish Revolution. Ensayo sobre los lenguajes indignados, Valencia, Uno y Cero Ediciones.
  • Mudde, Cas (2016), “Europe’s Populist Surge: A Long Time in the Making”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 95, nº 6, pp. 25-30.
  • Mudde, Cas y Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (2012), “Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis”, en Mudde, Cas y Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-26.
  • Mudde, Cas y Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (2017), Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, John (Coord.) (2014), #Podemos. Deconstruyendo a Pablo Iglesias, Barcelona, Deusto, 2ª ed.
  • Pelinka, Anton (2013), “Right-Wing Populism: Concept and Typology.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe. Politics and discourse, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitta Mral, 3–22, London: Bloomsbury.
  • Santiago Guervós, Javier de (2015), “La relexicalización en el discurso político actual: el ejemplo de populismo a través de la prensa española”, Boletín de la Real Academia Española (BRAE), Tomo XCV, cuaderno CCCXII, junio-diciembre, 471-500.
  • Santiago Guervós, Javier de (2016-2017), “Análisis del discurso populista en la España actual”, Analecta Malacitana, 39, 1. 115-141, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/Analecta.2017.v39i1.5611.
  • Taggart, Paul (2000), Populism, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • Weyland, Kurt (2001), “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, nº 1, pp. 1-22.
  • Weyland, Kurt (2003), “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How much affinity?”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 24, nº 6, pp. 1095-1115.
  • Wodak, Ruth (2015), The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Political Discourses Mean, London, SAGE.
  • Wodak, Ruth (2017), The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People” Who’s who?, Journal of Language and Politics, 16:4, 551–565.
  • Zienkowski, Jan y Breeze, Ruth (eds.) (2019), Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist discourses across the political spectrum, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.