Contingencia y finalidad. Kant y la perspectiva reflexiva sobre la naturaleza

  1. Alejandro G. Vigo
Revista:
Open Insight

ISSN: 2395-8936

Ano de publicación: 2017

Volume: 8

Número: 13

Páxinas: 123-159

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.23924/OI.V8N13A2017.PP123-160.198 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Open Insight

Resumo

This work follows closely the second part of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judgement to value the novelty of his peculiar approach to necessity and contingency, which he does not think of as opposed, but as coincident in relation to the consideration of Nature as a system of endings; while, at the same time, he thinks of it as a mechanism driven by efficient strengths. Indeed, when considering the possibility of concordance between objective laws and subjective maxims, in Nature, the reflexive judgement of the faculty of judgment allows to treat it as if it was a system of endings, in analogy with a theology adequate for human freedom Such an approach to teleology allows Kant to draw a Theology in accordance with the classical philosophical tradition.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • DesChene, D.. (2001). Spirits and Clocks. Machine and Organism in Descartes. Cornell University. Ithaca.
  • Gadamer, HG.. (1990). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. 6. Mohr Siebeck. Tübinga.
  • Kant, I., Klemme, H., Vorländer, K.. (1990). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Felix Meiner Verlag. Hamburg.
  • Kant, I., Klemme, H., Giordanetti, P.. (2001). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Felix Meiner Verlag. Hamburg.
  • Makreel, R.. (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. The hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgement. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
  • McLaughlin, P.. (1989). Kants Kritik der teleologischen Urteilskraft. Bouvier Verlag. Bonn.
  • Rossi, G.. (2011). El azar según Aristóteles. Estructuras de causalidad accidental en los procesos naturales y en la acción. Academia Verlag. Sankt Augustin, Alemania.
  • Vigo, A.. (2006). Reflexión y juicio. Diánoia. 27-64
  • Vigo, A.. (2010). Explicación causal y holismo de trasfondo en la filosofía natural de Aristóteles. Kriterion. 51. 587-615
  • Wieland, W.. (1970). Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles. 2. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Göttingen.
  • Zammito, J.. (1992). The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet