Publicaciones en colaboración con investigadores/as de Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (22)

2020

  1. Diagnostic criteria for acute FPIES: What are we missing?

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, Vol. 8, Núm. 5, pp. 1717-1720.e2

  2. Identification and Characterization of IgE-Reactive Proteins and a New Allergen (Cic a 1.01) from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

    Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, Vol. 64, Núm. 19

2018

  1. Practical guidelines for perioperative hypersensitivity reactions

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 28, Núm. 4, pp. 216-232

2016

  1. Basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease - An overview

    Allergo Journal, Vol. 25, Núm. 4, pp. 26-33

  2. Basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease – an overview

    Allergo Journal International, Vol. 25, Núm. 4, pp. 106-113

  3. Clinical performance of commercial ISAC 112 allergen microarray versus noncommercial RIRAAF platform for the diagnosis of plant food and olive pollen allergies

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology

  4. Is microarray analysis really useful and sufficient to diagnose nut allergy in the Mediterranean area?

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 26, Núm. 1, pp. 31-39

  5. Is the ISAC 112 microarray useful in the diagnosis of pollinosis in Spain?

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 26, Núm. 2, pp. 92-99

  6. Is the performance of ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 sufficient to diagnose peach and apple allergies?

    Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Vol. 116, Núm. 2, pp. 162-163

  7. Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT)

    Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, Vol. 16, Núm. 8

2015

  1. The clinical utility of basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease

    Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 70, Núm. 11, pp. 1393-1405

2013

  1. Recommendations for the use of in vitro methods to detect specific immunoglobulin E: Are they comparable?

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 23, Núm. 7, pp. 448-454

2012

  1. Performance of different in vitro techniques in the molecular diagnosis of peanut allergy

    Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 22, Núm. 7, pp. 508-513

  2. Pru p 3 acts as a strong sensitizer for peanut allergy in Spain

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 130, Núm. 6, pp. 1432-1434.e3

  3. Research needs in allergy: An EAACI position paper, in collaboration with EFA

    Clinical and Translational Allergy, Vol. 2, Núm. 1