Sostenibilidad de los sistemas de mejora continua en la industriaencuesta en la Comunidad Autónoma Vasca y Navarra

  1. Jaca García, M. Carmen
  2. Mateo Dueñas, Ricardo
  3. Tanco, Martín
  4. Viles Diez, Elisabeth
  5. Santos García, Javier
Zeitschrift:
Intangible Capital

ISSN: 1697-9818

Datum der Publikation: 2010

Ausgabe: 6

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 51-77

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.3926/IC.2010.V6N1.P51-77 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Intangible Capital

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

This article will examine the level of sustainability for companies in Continuous Improvement Management and the factors which are supporting sustainability during time, through a survey to 350 companies of Basque Autonomous Community and Navarra in June of 2009. The study presents some data about the development of the improvement systems. Then, factors that companies have related to the abandonment of improvement systems are analysed. Since improvement systems are based on workers� participation, this study characterizes this participation. Finally, the elements which have been used in the improvement systems by the companies are analyzed, and how objectives and indicators are used in their management system. To conclude, the following key issues are emphasized: a higher involvement of workforce in improvement systems, the integration of improvement system in the management system and the establishment of associated indicators to the system.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • AENOR, 2000. NORMA UNE-EN-ISO 9004:2000. Sistemas de gestión de la calidad. Directrices para la mejora del desempeño. Madrid: AENOR 2000.
  • AOKI, K. (2008). Transferring japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants in China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(6):518-539.
  • ASIF, M.; JOOST DE BRUIJN, E.; FISSCHER, O.A.M.; SEARCY, C.; STEENHUIS, H. (2009a). Process embedded design of integrated management systems. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(3):261-282.
  • ASIF, M.; JOOST DE BRUIJN, E.; DOUGLAS, A.; FISSCHER, O.A.M. (2009b). Why quality management programs fail: a strategic and operations management perspective. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(8):778-794.
  • BATEMAN, N. (2005). Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3):261-276.
  • BATEMAN, N.; ARTHUR, D. (2002). Process improvement programmes: a model for assessing sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(5):515-526.
  • BATEMAN, N.; RICH, N. (2003). Companies' perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2):185-199.
  • BEER, M. (2003). Why total quality management programs do not persist: the role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation. Decision Sciences, 34(4):623-642.
  • BERGER, A. (1997).Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(2):110-117.
  • BESSANT, J.; CAFFYN, S.; GALLAGHER, M. (2001). An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour. Technovation, 21(2):67-77.
  • BESSANT, J.; FRANCIS, D. (1999). Developing strategic continuous improvement capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(11):1106-1119.
  • BESSANT, J.; CAFFYN, S. (1997). High-Involvement innovation through continuous improvement. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1):7-28.
  • BESSANT, J.; CAFFYN, S.; GILBERT, J.; HARDING, R.; WEBB, S. (1994). Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation, 14(1):17-29.
  • BHUIYAN, N.; BAGHEL, A.; WILSON, J. (2006). A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(8):671-687.
  • BISGAARD, S. (2007). Quality management and Juran's legacy. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23:665-677.
  • BOWEN, H.K.; SPEAR, S. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 95-106.
  • BRUNET, A.P.; NEW, S. (2003). Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(12):1426-1446.
  • CAFFYN, S. (1999). Development of a continuous improvement self-Assessment tool. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(11):1138-1153.
  • COONEY, R.; SOHAL, A. (2004). Teamwork and total quality management: a durable partnership. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(8):1131.
  • DE LANGE-ROS, D.J. (1999). Continuous improvement in teams. the (mis)fit between improvement and operational activities of improvement teams, University of Twente, Enschede., PhD thesis.
  • DELBRIDGE, R.; LOWE, J.; OLIVER, N. (2000). Shopfloor responsibilities under lean teamworking. Human Relations, 53(11):1459-1479.
  • FORZA, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2):152-194.
  • FROHLICH, M. T. (2002). Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. J. Oper. Manage., 20(1):53-62.
  • GARCIA-SABATER, J.J.; MARIN-GARCIA, J.A. (2009). Facilitadores y barreras para la sostenibilidad de la mejora continua: un estudio en proveedores del automóvil de la Comunidad Valenciana. Intangible Capital, 1:183-209.
  • HE, Z. (2009). Learn something about your Six sigma program's maturity. Quality Progress, august 2009, 23-28.
  • HSUAN-KAI, C.; HSUAN-YUEH, C.; HSIN-HUNG, W.; WEN-TSANN, L. (2004). TQM implementation in a healthcare and pharmaceutical logistics organization: the case of Zuellig Pharma in Taiwan. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(9):1171-1178.
  • HUQ, Z., (2005). Managing change: a barrier to TQM implementation in service industries. Managing Service Quality, 15(5):452-469.
  • IDRIS, M. A.; AND ZAIRI, M. (2006). Sustaining TQM: a synthesis of literature and proposed research framework. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(9):1245.
  • IMAI, M. (1989). Kaizen: the key to japan's competitive success. Random House Business Division. New York.
  • INSTITUTO DE ESTADÍSTICA DE NAVARRA. (2006). Datos de 2006:<http://www.Cfnavarra.es/estadistica/agregados/nav_europa/PIB_UE_95_06.xls >, consultado: septiembre de 2009.
  • IRANI, Z.; BESKESE, A.; LOVE, P.E.D. (2004). Total quality management and corporate culture: constructs of organisational excellence. Technovation, 24(8):643-650.
  • JANZ, B. (1999). Self-directed teams in is: correlates for improved systems development work outcomes. Information & Management, 35(3):171-192.
  • JØRGENSEN, F.; BOER, H.; GERTSEN F. (2003). Jump-starting continuous improvement through self-assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(10):1260-1278.
  • JØRGENSEN, F.; BOER, H.; GERTSEN F. (2004). Development of a team-based ramework for conducting self-assessment of continuous improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(4):343-349.
  • KAYE, M.; ANDERSON, R. (1999). Continuous Improvement: the ten essential criteria. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16(5):485-509.
  • KOBAYASHI, I. (1995). 20 Keys to Workplace Improvement, Productivity Press, Portland.
  • LAGACÉ, D.; BOURGAULT, M., (2003). Linking manufacturing improvement programs to the competitive priorities of Canadian SMEs. Technovation, 23(8): 705-715.
  • LAWLER, E. E. I.; MOHRMAN, S. A. (1985). Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review, 63(1):64-71.
  • LIKERT, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140: 1-55.
  • LILLRANK, P.; SHANI, A. B.; LINDBERG, P. (2001). Continuous improvement: exploring alternative organizational designs. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 12(1):41-55.
  • LIN, L.; LI, T.; KIANG, J.P. (2009). A continual improvement framework with integration of CMMI and six-sigma model for auto industry. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 25(5):551-569.
  • PRAJOGO, D.I.; SOHAL, A.S. (2004). The sustainability and evolution of quality improvement programmes-an Australian case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(2):205.
  • PUN, K.F.; CHIN, K.S.; GILL, R. (2001). Determinants of employee involvement practices in manufacturing enterprises. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 12(1):95.
  • RAPP, C.; AND EKLUND, J. (2002). Sustainable development of improvement activities - the long-term operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company. Total Quality Management, 13(7):945-969.
  • READMAN, J. (2007). What challenges lie ahead for improvement programmes in the UK? Lessons from the CINet Continuous Improvement Survey 2003. International Journal of Technology Management, 37(3):290.
  • SCHROEDER, D.M.; ROBINSON, A.G. (1991). America's most successful export to Japan: continuous improvement programs. Sloan Management Review, 32(3):67-81.
  • SPACKMAN, L. (2009). Nine steps to make process improvement permanent. Quality Progress, April 2009:23-28.
  • SUÁREZ, M.F. (2007). La sostenibilidad de la mejora continua de procesos en la administración pública: un estudio en los ayuntamientos de España. Universidad Ramón Llul, Barcelona Tesis doctoral.
  • TEARE, R.; MUNRO-FAURE, L.; MUNRO-FAURE, M.; SCHEUING, E.; BOWEN, J.T. (1999). Modelling team structures: a grounded approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(4):380-393.
  • UPTON, D. (1996). Mechanisms for building and sustaining operations improvement. European Management Journal, 14(3):215-228.
  • WU, C.W.; CHEN, C.L. (2006). An integrated structural model toward successful continuous improvement activity. Technovation, 26(5-6):697-707.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet