Neurocosmética, transhumanismo y materialismo eliminativohacia nuevas formas de eugenesia
ISSN: 1132-1989, 2386-3773
Year of publication: 2012
Volume: 23
Issue: 77
Pages: 37-52
Type: Article
More publications in: Cuadernos de bioética
Abstract
In this paper I present similarities and connections between Transhumanism and Eliminative Materialism. Concretely, I study the arguments with which in both positions it is defended a merely instrumental idea of human body and, because of that, one infinitely mouldable. First, I show the social relevance of this idea and its projections in phenomena as medicalization of human condition and, especially, cosmetic psychopharmacology. Besides, I denounce that such influences are caused by illegitimate transference of authority between philosophical and scientific forums. Second, according to my analysis, these new postmodern fashions of chemical sentimentalism (related with radical changes on personal identity and human nature) drive to new eugenic forms what I name autoeugenics. Finally, I call attention to the important role of utopian speeches about the science of tomorrow and super-human civilization in a Carpe Diem society. In my conclusions, I claim that historical reasoning or warnings about what is coming are not efficient strategies to control neither new psychopharmacological habits nor passivity generated by them. Returning social confidence in the power of reason to achieve reality (and other human beings) is, in my opinion, the best way to rehabilitate a more and more devalued human action.
Bibliographic References
- Miah, A. Posthumanism: A critical history. In Gordijn B & Chadwick R (eds.). Medical Enhancement & Posthumanism. New York: Routledge, 2007.
- Greely H, Sahakian B, Harris J, Kessler RC, Gazzaniga M, Campbell P, Farah MJ. «Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the Healthy». Nature 2008, 456: p. 702-705.
- Kramer P. Escuchando al Prozac. Barcelona: Seix Barral. 1994, p. 306.
- Chatterjee A. «Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood». Neurology 63(6): pp. 968-974.
- Cerullo M. «Cosmetic psychopharmacology and the President’s Council on Bioethics». Perspect Biol Med, 2006; 49(4): 515-523.
- Stein DJ. «Cosmetic psychopharmacology of anxiety: bioethical considerations». Current Psychiatry Reports, 2005; 7(4): 237-238.
- Racine E, Waldman S, Rosenberg J, Illes J. «Contemporary neuroscience in the media». Social Science & Medicine, 2010, 71: 725-733.
- Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
- Davidson D. «Actions, Reasons and Causes». Journal of Philosophy 1963; 60: 685-700.
- Davidson D. The Irreducibility of Psychological and Physiological Description, and of Social to Physical Sciences. In Stevenson L (ed). The Study of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press 1981; pp. 318-324.
- Feigl H. The «Mental» and the «Physical», The Essay and a Postscript, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1967.
- Churchland PM. «Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes». Journal of Philosophy, 1981: 78(2): 67-90.
- Bostrom N. «Are you living a computer simulation?». Philosophical Quartely, 2003, 53(211), pp. 243-255.
- Bostrom N, Kulczycki M. «A Patch for the Simulation Argument». Analysis, 2011, 71(1): pp. 54-61.
- Rothman SM, Rothman DJ. The Pursuit of Perfection: The Promise and Perils of Medical Enhancement. New York, Random House, 2003.
- Dreyfus H. Alchemy and AI. Rand Corporation, 1965.
- Dreyfus H, What Computers Still Can’t Do. A Critique of Artificial Reason. Washington DC: Library of congress, 1992; p. 86.
- Dennett D. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Allen Lane, 2006.
- Pinker S. The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking, 2002.