La participación de los trabajadoresclave para el éxito de los sistemas de mejora continua

  1. Jurburg Melnik, Daniel
  2. Tanco, Martín
  3. Viles Diez, Elisabeth
  4. Ricardo Mateo
Zeitschrift:
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería

ISSN: 2301-1092,  2301-1106

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Nummer: 13

Seiten: 17-32

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería

Zusammenfassung

21st century companies are immersed in a fierce competition to survive and excel. In order to achieve excellence, the key is to develop holistic strategies aimed at continuous improvement of processes within the organization. However, one of the main obstacles to overcome on this path towards excellence is precisely the involvement and commitment of all workers over time. This problem is well mentioned in the literature, but the reasons why people choose to participate or not in these initiatives are still not entirely clear. Motivated by this, this article seeks to contribute to the understanding of the relationship between continuous improvement systems elements and employees� intention to participate. Based on a survey of Spanish companies, it was found that those companies applying a series of continuous improvement habits believe their systems to be more sustainable over time and their workers to be more engaged. In view of these results, a Delphi panel was conducted to deepen into what were the key elements that managers must consider when deploying a system of continuous improvement, in order to encourage employee participation.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Citas [1] T. G. Kim, S. Hornung, and D.M. Rousseau, “Change-supportive employee behavior: antecedents and the moderating role of time”, J. Manage., vol.37, no.6, pp. 1664-1693, 2011.
  • [2] Z. Tang, X. Chen, and Z. Wu, “Using behavior theory to investigate individual-level determinants of employee involvement,” Total Quality Manage. & Bus. Excellence, vol. 21, no.11-12, pp. 1231-1260, 2010.
  • [3] C. E. Dawkins and J. W. Frass, “Decision of union workers to participate in employee involvement: an application of the theory of planned behavior,” Employee Relations, vol. 27, no.5, pp. 511-531, 2005.
  • [4] C. Jaca, E. Viles, R. Mateo, and J. Santos, “Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practice,” The TQM J., vol. 24, pp. 142-154, 2012.
  • [5] D. I. Prajogo and A. S. Sohal, “The sustainability and evolution of quality improvement programmes—an Australian case study,” Total Quality Manage. & Bus. Excellence vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 205-220, 2004.
  • [6] C. Rapp, and J. Eklund, “Sustainable development of a suggestion system: factors influencing improvement activities in a confectionary company,” Human Factors and Ergonom. in Manufacturing & Service Ind., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 79-94, 2007.
  • [7] B. Daily and S. Huang, “Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1539-1552, 2001.
  • [8] R. Cooney and A. Sohal, “Teamwork and total quality management: a durable partnership,” Total Quality Manage. & Bus. Excellence, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1131-1141, 2004.
  • [9] J. Beassant and S. Caffyn, “High involvement innovation through continuous improvement,” Int. J. Technology Manage., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7-28, 1997.
  • [10] Z. Irani, A. Beskese, and P. Love, “Total quality management and corporate culture constructs of organizational excellence,” Technovation, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 643-650, 2004.
  • [11] B. Janz, “Self-directed teams in is: correlates for improved systems development work outcomes,” Inform. & Manage., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 171-192, 1999.
  • [12] E. Deming, Out of the Crisis, 9th ed. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1982.
  • [13] S. Shingo, Fundamentals Principles of Lean Manufacturing. Vancouver: PCS Press, 2009.
  • [14] J. Womack, D.T. Jones, and D. Roos, The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: Free Press, 1990.
  • [15] S. Caffyn, “Development of a continuous improvement self-assessment tool,” Int. J. Operations and Prod. Manage., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1138-1153, 1999.
  • [16] M. Dabhilkar, L. Bengtsson, and J. Beassant, “Convergence or national specifity? testing the CI maturity model across multiple countries,” Creative and Innovation Manage., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 348-362, 2007.
  • [17] N. Bateman and A. David, “Process improvement programmes: a model for assessing sustainability,” Int. J. Operations and Prod. Manage., vol. 22, pp. 515-526, 2002.
  • [18] J. A. Eguren, U. Elorza, and L. Pozueta, “Model/framework for addressing continuous improvement projects effectively and efficiently using six sigma methodology. Case study of automotive auxiliary company,” Manage. and Prod. Eng. Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 35-46, 2012.
  • [19] M. A. Idris, and M. Zairi, “Sustaining TQM: a synthesis of literature and proposed research framework,” Total Quality Manage., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1245-1260, 2006.
  • [20] D. I. Prajogo and A.A. Sohal, “The sustainability of improvement activities - the longterm operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company,” Total Quality Manage., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 205-210, 2004.
  • [21] C. Rapp and J. Eklund, “Sustainable development of improvement activities - the longterm operations of a suggestion scheme in Swedish company,” Total Quality Manage., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 945-969, 2002.
  • [22] D. Jurburg, E. Viles, C. Jaca, and M. Tanco, “Why are companies still struggling to reach higher continuous improvement maturity levels? Empirical evidence from high performance companies”, TQM J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 316-327, 2015.
  • [23] Euskalit. (2012). Situación de las empresas industriales vascas en el ámbito de la gestión avanzada [Online]. Available: http://www.euskalit.net/ (18/06/2015).
  • [24] Gallup. (2013). State of the global Workplace: Employee Engagement insight for business leaders worldwide[Online]. Available: http://www.gallup.com/ (18/06/2015).
  • [25] A. S. Al-Eisa, M. A. Furayyan, and A. M. Alhemoud, “An empirical examination of the effects of self-efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention”, Manage. Decision, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1221-1244, 2009.
  • [26] J. B. Bingham, B. W. Mitchell, D. G. Bishop, and N. J. Allen, “Working for a higher purpose: a theoretical framework for commitment to organization-sponsored causes,” Human Resource Manage. Review, no. 23, pp. 174-189, 2013.
  • [27] N. L. Jimmieson, M. Peach and K. M. White utilizing the theory of planned behavior to inform change management. An investigation of employee intentions to support organizational change,” J. Appl. Behavioral Sci., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 237-262, 2008.
  • [28] D. Jurburg, E. Viles, M. Tanco and R. Mateo Continuous Improvement Challenges: What is the relationship between maturity levels, system sustainability and employee participation?, Working paper under review, 2015.
  • [29] J. Bessant, S. Caffyn and M. Gallagher “An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behavior,” Technovation, vol. 21, pp. 67-77, 2001.
  • [30] F. Jorgensen, H. Boer, and B. T. Laugen, “CI implementation: an empirical test of the CI maturity model, creativity and innovation management, vol. 15, pp. 328-337, 2006.
  • [31] J. J. Garcia-Sabater, J. A. Marin-Garcia and M. R. Perello-Marin “Is implementation of continuous improvement possible? An evolutionary model of enablers and inhibitors,” Human Factors Ergonom. in Manufacturing & Service Ind., vol. 22, pp. 99-112, 2012.
  • [32] D. Jurburg, E. Viles, M. Tanco and R. Mateo, “What motivates employees to participate in continuous improvement activities?,” Working paper under review, 2015.
  • [33] H. Linstone, and M. Turoff, “Delphi: a brief look backward and forward,” Technological forecasting & social changes”, vol. 78, pp. 1712-1719, 2011.
  • [34] J. Landeta, “Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 73, pp. 476-482, 2006.
  • [35] H. A. Akkermans, P. Bogerd, E. Yücesan, and L. N. van Wassenhove, “The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study,” European J. Operational Research, vol. 146, pp. 284-301, 2003.
  • [36] S. A. Melnyk, R. R. Lummus, R. J. Vokurka, L. J. Burns and J. Sandor “Mapping the future of supply chain management: a Delphi study,” Int. J. Prod. Research, vol. 47, no.16, pp. 4629-4653, 2009.
  • [37] H. A. von der Gracht “Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance,” Technological Forecasting & Social change, vol. 79, pp. 1525-1536, 2012.
  • [38] C. Okoli and S. D. Pawlowski, “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications,” Inform. Manage., vol. 42, pp. 15-29, 2004.
  • [39] Y. Bar-Yam, Dynamics of Complex Systems. Boulder, CO : Westview Press, 2003.
  • [40] M. Asif, E. J. de Bruijn, A. Douglas and O. A. Fischer “Why quality management programs fail: a strategic and operations management perspective,” Int. J. of Quality & Reliability Manage., vol. 26, pp. 778-794, 2009.
  • [41] H. Kaynak “The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance,” J. of Operations Manage., vol. 21, pp. 405-435, 2003.
  • [42] V. R. Prybutok and R. Ramasesh “An action-research based instrument for monitoring continuous quality improvement” European J. Operational Research, vol. 166, pp. 293-309, 2005.
  • [43] C. C. Yang, T. M. Yeh and K. J. Yang “The Implementation of Technical Practices and Human Factors of the Toyota Production System in Different Industries,” Human Factors and Ergonom. in Manufacturing & Service Ind., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 541-555, 2012.
  • [44] J. Readman and J. Bessant “What challenges lie ahead for improvement programmes in the UK? Lessons from the CINet Continuous Improvement Survey 2003,” Int. J. Technology Manage., vol. 37, pp. 290-305, 2007.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet