El Intelecto agente según Ignatio Vincentio

  1. Juan Fernando Sellés 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Journal:
Revista española de filosofía medieval

ISSN: 1133-0902

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 22

Pages: 239-251

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21071/REFIME.V22I.6223 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista española de filosofía medieval

Abstract

In this work we review the three principal theses that Ignatio Vincentio, a Spanish thinker of the seventeenth century, defends about the agent intellect: 1) it is the same potency as the possible intellect, only with a formal distinction and plurality of names; 2) it has three tasks: a) to illuminate phantasmata, b) to make them intelligible in act, and c) to abstract the intelligible species from them; and 3) it will remain in the separated soul performing the same task as in the present situation [(in thislife)?], but without conversion to phantasmata. .

Bibliographic References

  • Antonio Rubio, Commentarii in libros Aristotelis Stagiritae philosophorum principis. In De anima,Alcalá 1611; Lugduni, Sumptibus Antonii Pillehotte, 1620.
  • Chrysostomi Iavelli Canapicii,Super tres libros Arist. de Anima quaestiones Subtilissimae: in quibus clarissime resoluuntur dubia Aristotelis &c. Commentatoris, Venetiis, apud Hieronymum Scotum, 1552.
  • Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, In tres libros De anima Aristotelis Stagiritae, Coloniae, sumptibus haeredum lazari Zetzeneri, 1629
  • Dionisium Blasco, Carmelitam, Hortulus phylosophicus siue Cursus integer ad breuissimam sum-mam redactus: continet Summulas, Logicam, Metaphysicam, Physicam, Lib. de Generat. Coelo, Mundo, Anima & Metheoris, mandatur typis ope & opere Martini Bernar, Caesaraugustae, apud Ioannem de Ybar, 1668
  • Dominicus Banez, O.P., Scholastica Commentariam in D. Thomam, 1586
  • Francisci Sylvestri Ferrariensis, Quaestiones luculentissimae in tres libros de anima Aristotelis, Vene-tiis, apud Haeredem Hieronymi Scoti, 1601
  • Francisco de Toledo, Opera Omnia Philosophica, vol. 3, De anima, Coloniae Agrippinae, In Officina Birckmannica sumptibus Herman Mylii, 1615.
  • Francisci Suarez, Societate Iesu, Partis secundae Summae Theologiae, tomus alter, complectens Trac-tatum secundum De Opere sex Dierum ac tertium, De Anima, Lugduni, sumpt. Gabrielis Boissat & Sociorum, 1635
  • Hugonem Cavellum, Ord. Min. Doctoris subtilis Io. Duns Scoti quaestiones super libris Aristotelis De anima: Ab obliuione postliminio restitutae; innumeris, quibus scatebant mendis, correctae; citationibus philosophi. Cum Panegyrico Ioannis Duns Scoti et duplici indice, Lugduni, Sumptibus Claudij Landry, 1625.
  • Ignatio Vincentio, Cursus philosophicus: in quo totius scholae quaestiones; tomus IV, complectenslibros de Anima, Tolosae, excudebat Ioannes Boude, 1666.
  • Ignatium Ponce Vacca, Disputationes in libros Aristoteles de ortu et interitu et in libros de anima: iuxta mentem et expositionem doctoris resolute Joannis Bachoni Anglici; tomus primus, Matriti, typis Antonii Perez de Soto, 1750.
  • Juan de Sto. Tomás, Cursus Philosophicus, vol. III, Turín, Marietti, 1949, In Tres libros de Anima, q. X, a. 1.., Capítulo II. Introducción.
  • Silvestre de Ferrara, Commentaria In Summa Contra Gentes, Roma, ed. Leonina, vol. XIII, 1918-1926, 492, a, VIII.
  • Tomás de Vio, Comentaria in libros Aristotelis De anima, l. III, ed. de G. Picard y G. Pelland, Bruges, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1965
Data source: Dialnet