Metodología de estudio de la fauna cavernícola del grupo Collembola en la península ibérica.

  1. Enrique Baquero
  2. Enrique Beruete
  3. Rafael Jordana
Zeitschrift:
Boletín de la SEA

ISSN: 1134-6094

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Nummer: 68

Seiten: 391-402

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Boletín de la SEA

Zusammenfassung

For some years the activity of speleology has seen its objectives enriched with the study of cavernicolous lifeforms. Many biologists study now the biocoenoses in thousands of cavities throughout the world, including some where only geological data had hitherto been collected. There are also many traditional speleologists who during their expeditions, in addition to making maps and collecting physicochemical parameters, are now collecting biological material that they send to taxonomists with whom they collaborate. The fauna of the caves is at once very interesting and delicate and scarce, so the capture of specimens must be done both with the utmost care and under strict limits in the number of captured specimens. The visit to a cave with fauna, as well as the capture, collection of information, and sample shipment to the taxonomists, should be done with the utmost rigor. We list and summarily describe summarily aspects intended to achieve this objective. The attitudes, methodologies (such as direct capture or traps), materials to be used, labeling, and the shipment procedures are considered. Although most of the methodological issues do not refer to a specific geographic area, we include a key focusing on the genera present in the Iberian Peninsula. However, given the biological wealth existing in this territory, it will be of some use for other regions.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • BOETZL, F.A., RIES, E., SCHNEIDER, G. & KRAUSS, J. 2018. It’s a matter of design—how pitfall trap design affects trap samples and possible predictions. PeerJ, 6: e5078. https://doi. org/10.7717/peerj.5078
  • CHAPMAN, P. 1985. Cave Biology on Tropical Expeditions. Cave Science, 12(3): 81-84.
  • CULVER, D.C. & J.R. HOLSINGER 1992. How many species of troglobites are there? Bulletin of the National Speleological Society, 54: 79-80. HAMILTON-SMITH,E. 1971. The classification of cavernicoles. Bulletin of the National Speleological Society, 33(1): 63-67. HOWART, F.G. 1983. Ecology of Cave Arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 28: 365-89.
  • HUNT, M. & MILLAR,I. 2001. Cave Invertebrata Collecting Guide. Series: Department of Conservation technical series, 26: 28 pp.
  • JUBERTHIE, C., D. DELAY & M. BOUILLON 1980. Extension du milieu souterrain en zone non calcaire: description d’un nouveau milieu et de son peuplement par les Coléoptères troglobies. Mémoires de Biospéologie, 7: 19-52.
  • JUREKOVA, N., N. RACHMANOVA, L. KOVAE, D. MIKLISOVA, M. ÈERVENA &J. CHRISTOPHORYOVA 2019. Type of fixative solution in pitfall traps as a decisive factor affecting community parameters of Collembola (Hexapoda) inhabiting superficial subterranean hábitats. The Science of Nature, 106: 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-019-1611-3
  • KOZEL, P., T. PIPAN, N. ŠAJNA, S. POLAK & T. NOVAK 2017. Mitigating the conflict between pitfall-trap sampling and conservation of terrestrial subterranean communities in caves. International Journal of Speleology, 46(3): 359-368. https:// doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.46.3.2123
  • KRANTZ, G. W. & D.E.E. WALTER 2009. A Manual of Acarology. Third Edition. Lubbock (Texas): Texas Tech University Press. 807 pp.
  • MAMMOLA, S.,E. PIANO, P.M. GIACHINO &M. ISAIA 2017. An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology, 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
  • ORTUÑO, V.M.,J.D. GILGADO, A.JIMÉNEZ-VALVERDE, A. SENDRA, G. PÉREZ-SUÁREZ et al. 2013. The “Alluvial Mesovoid Shallow Substratum”, a New Subterranean Habitat. PloS ONE, 8(10): e76311. https://doi.org/journal.pone.0076311
  • OSETO, C. & T.J. GIBB 2005. Arthropod Collection and Identification: Laboratory and Field Techniques. Academic Press, 336 pp.
  • SENDRA, A., A. ACHURRA, P. BARRANCO, E. BERUETE, P.A.V. BORGES, J.J. HERRERO-BORGOÑÓN, A.I. CAMACHO, C. GALÁN, L.I. GARCÍA, D. JAUME, R. JORDANA, J. MODESTO, M.A. MONSALVE, P. OROMÍ, V.M. ORTUÑO, C. PRIETO, A.S. REBOLEIRA, P. RODRÍGUEZ, J.M. SALGADO, S. TERUEL, A. TINAUT & J.A. ZARAGOZA 2011. Biodiversidad, Regiones Biogeográficas y Conservación de la Fauna Subterránea Hispano-Lusa. Boletín de la Sociedad Aragonesa (S.E.A.), 49: 365-400. www.sea-entomologia.org
  • SENDRA,A.&A.S.P.S. REBOLEIRA 2014. La extensión y los límites de la fauna en los hábitats subterráneos. Boletín de la Asociación española de Entomología, 38(3–4): 203-224.
  • SKVALRLA, M.J., J.L. LARSON, & A.P.G. DOWLING 2014. Pitfalls and preservatives: a review. Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario (JESO), 145: 15-43.
  • WALKER, A.K. & T.K. CROSBY 1988. The preparation and curation of insects. DSIR Information series 163. Science Information Publishing Centre, DSIR, Wellington.
  • WOMERSLEY,H. 1943. A modification of Berlese’s medium for the microscopic mounting of Acarina and other small arthropods. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 67: 181-182
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet