La estandarización en el trasplante endotelial de membrana de Descemetresultados de las primeras 450 cirugías

  1. M. Satué 1
  2. M. Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora 1
  3. M. Naveiras 1
  4. J. Cabrerizo 2
  5. I. Dapena 3
  6. G.R.J. Melles 4
  1. 1 Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam
  2. 2 Hospital Universitario de Álava, Vitoria
  3. 3 Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid
  4. 4 Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The
Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 90

Issue: 8

Pages: 356-364

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2015.01.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the clinical outcome of the first 450 consecutive cases after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), as well as the effect of standardization of the technique. Material and methods Comparison between 3 groups: Group I: (cases 1-125), as the extended learning curve; Group II: (cases 126-250), transition to technique standardization; Group III: (cases 251-450), surgery with standardized technique. Best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density, pachymetry and intra- and postoperative complications were evaluated before, and 1, 3 and 6 months after DMEK. Results At 6 months after surgery, 79% of eyes reached a best corrected visual acuity of≥0.8 and 43%≥1.0. Mean preoperative endothelial cell density was 2,530±220 cells/mm² and 1,613±495 at 6 months after surgery. Mean pachymetry measured 668±92 μm and 526±46 μm pre- and (6 months) postoperatively, respectively. There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density and pachymetry between the 3 groups (P > .05). Graft detachment presented in 17.3% of the eyes. The detachment rate declined from 24% to 12%, and the rate of secondary surgeries from 9.6% to 3.5%, from group I to III respectively. Conclusions Visual outcomes and endothelial cell density after DMEK are independent of the technique standardization. However, technique standardization may have contributed to a lower graft detachment rate and a relatively low number of secondary interventions required. As such, DMEK may become the first choice of treatment in corneal endothelial disease.