Traducción y adaptación transcultural al contexto español del Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) para profesionales de la salud

  1. Begoña Errasti-Ibarrondo 1
  2. Virginia La Rosa-Salas 1
  3. Marta Lizarbe-Chocarro 1
  4. Ana Choperena 1
  5. Leire Arbea Moreno 2
  6. Mónica Vázquez-Calatayud 1
  7. María José Galán-Espinilla 2
  8. Brendan McCormack 3
  9. Ana Carvajal-Valcárcel 1
  10. Yvonne Gavela-Ramos 4
  1. 1 Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España.
  2. 2 Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España
  3. 3 University of Sydney. Sydney. Australia.
  4. 4 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

ISSN: 1137-6627

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 46

Número: 2

Páginas: 4-16

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.23938/ASSN.1039 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

Resumen

Fundamento. El Cuidado Centrado en la Persona (CCP) se ha convertido en un tema central dentro del ámbito sanitario acorde con las políticas de salud nacionales e internacionales. El Person Centred Practice Inventory Staff (PCPI-S) es un instrumento basado en el modelo teórico Person-Centred Practice Framework que evalúa la percepción que tienen los profesionales de la salud sobre una práctica centrada en la persona. El objetivo del estudio es obtener la primera versión española del PCPI-S traducido y adaptado a nuestro contexto español. Método. Se llevó a cabo una traducción y adaptación cultural del instrumento utilizando la guía Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures—Principles of Good Practice (PGP) que incluyó una sesión con expertos. También se realizó una validación de contenido de la claridad y relevancia de cada ítem (I-CVI), así como del cuestionario total (S-CVI/Ave). Resultados. No se encontraron dificultades para llegar a un consenso en los doce ítems que necesitaron ser clarificados. El índice de validez de contenido por ítem (I-CVI) obtuvo una puntuación excelente para claridad en 53 ítems, y para relevancia en 59; el índice de validez de contenido del cuestionario (S-CVI/Ave) mostró resultados excelentes (≥90). Conclusiones. Se ha obtenido la primera versión del PCPI-S adaptada al español, conceptual y semánticamente equivalente al cuestionario original. Este instrumento permitirá identificar la percepción que tienen los profesionales de la salud sobre una práctica centrada en la persona.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • HARDING E, WAIT S, SCRUTTON J. The state of play in person-centred care: A pragmatic review of how person-centred care is defined, applied and measured. London: The Health Policy Partnership Ltd, 2015. https://www.healthpolicypartnership.com/app/uploads/The-state-of-play-in-person-centred-care-summary.pdf
  • Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO). Person-and family-centred care clinical best practice guidelines. Toronto: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, 2015. https://rnao.ca/bpg
  • MCCORMACK B, MCCANCE T, BULLEY C, BROWN D, MCMILLAN A, MARTIN S. Fundamentals of person-centred healthcare practice. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2021.
  • MCCORMACK B, DEWING J, MCCANCE T. Developing person-centred care: addressing contextual challenges through practice development. Online J Issues Nurs 2011; 16(2): 3. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man03
  • DE SILVA D. Helping measure person-centred care. London: The Health Foundation, 2014. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/helping-measure-person-centred-care
  • World health Organization. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services: report by the Secretariat. Geneve: World health Organization, 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252698/A69_39-en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • ROCCO N, SCHER K, BASBERG B, YALAMANCHI S, BAKER-GENAW K. Patient-centered plan-of-care tool for improving clinical outcomes. Qual Manag Health Care 2011; 20(2): 89-97. http://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0b013e318213e728
  • HUDON C, FORTIN M, HAGGERTY JL, LAMBERT M, POITRAS ME. Measuring patients’ perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9(2): 155-164. http://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1226
  • BING-JONSSON PC, SLATER P, MCCORMACK B, FAGERSTRÖM L. Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S). BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18(1): 555. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3374-5
  • SLATER P, MCCANCE T, MCCORMACK B. The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S). Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29(4): 541-547. http://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx066
  • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.17226/10027
  • MCCORMACK B, BORG M, CARDIFF S, DEWING J, JACOBS G, JANES N et al. Person-centredness - the ‘state’ of the art. International Practice Development Journal 2015; 5(Suppl): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.5SP.003
  • KITSON A, MARSHALL A, BASSETT K, ZEITZ K. What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69(1): 4-15. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x
  • ROBERGE D, TREMBLAY D, TURGEON MÈ, BERBICHE D. Patients’ and professionals’ evaluations of quality of care in oncology outpatient clinics. Supportive Care in Cancer 2013; 21(11): 2983-2990. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1872-x
  • EDVARDSSON D, INNES A. Measuring Person-centered Care: a critical comparative review of published tools. Gerontologist 2010; 50(6): 834-846. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq047
  • MARTÍNEZ T, SUÁREZ-ÁLVAREZ J, YANGUAS J, MUÑIZ J. Spanish validation of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT). Aging Ment Health 2016; 20(5): 550-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1023768
  • MARTÍNEZ T, SUÁREZ-ÁLVAREZ J, YANGUAS J, MUNIZ J. The Person Centered approach in Gerontology: New validity evidence of the Staff Assessment Person-directed Care Questionnaire. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2016; 16: 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.12.001
  • MARTÍNEZ T, MARTÍNEZ-LOREDO V, CUESTA M, MUNIZ J. Assessment of Person-Centered Care in Gerontology services: A new tool for healthcare professionals. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2020; 20: 62-70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.003
  • WEIS MLD, WALLNER M, KÖCK‐HÓDI S, HILDEBRANDT C, MCCORMACK B, MAYER H. German translation, cultural adaptation and testing of the Person‐centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI‐S). Nurs Open 2020; 7(5): 1400-1411. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.511
  • BALQIS-ALI NZ, SAW PS, JAILANI AS, FUN WH, MOHD SALEH N, TENGKU BAHANUDDIN TPZ et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and exploratory factor analysis of the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S) questionnaire among Malaysian primary healthcare providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21(1): 32. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06012-9
  • KIM S, TAK SH. Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs 2021; 51(3): 363. http://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21027
  • CHOPERENA A, GAVELA-RAMOS Y, LIZARBE-CHOCARRO M, GALÁN-ESPINILLA MJ, ERRASTI-IBARRONDO B, LA ROSA-SALAS V et al. Traducción y adaptación transcultural al contexto español del marco teórico Person-Centred Practice Framework. An Sist Sanit Navar 2022; 45(3): e1016. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1016
  • MCCANCE T, MCCORMACK B, SLATER P, MCCONNELL D. Examining the theoretical relationship between constructs in the Person-Centred Practice Framework: a structural equation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(24): 13138. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413138
  • BEATON DE, BOMBARDIER C, GUILLEMIN F, FERRAZ MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186-3191. http://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  • WILD D, GROVE A, MARTIN M, EREMENCO S, MCELROY S, VERJEE-LORENZ A et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health 2005; 8(2): 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
  • POLIT DF, BECK CT, OWEN SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30(4): 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  • CICCHETTI DV, SPARROW SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 1981; 86(2): 127-137.
  • WALTZ CF, STRICKLAND OL, LENZ ER. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. 4th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
  • CARVAJAL A, CENTENO C, WATSON R, MARTÍNEZ M, RUBIALES AS. How is an instrument for measuring health to be validated? An Sist Sanit Navar 2011; 34(1): 63-72. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1137-66272011000100007
  • HAN CJ. A concept analysis of personalized health care in nursing. Nurs Forum 2016; 51(1): 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12117
  • Queen Margaret University. Resources. Centre for Person-centred Practice Research. 2020. Consultado el 28 de junio de 2022. https://www.cpcpr.org/resources
  • O’DONNELL D, SLATER P, MCCANCE T, MCCORMACK B, MCILFATRICK S. The development and validation of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Student instrument: A modified Delphi study. Nurse Educ Today 2021; 100: 104826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104826
  • AL-JABRI F, TURUNEN H, KVIST T. Patients’ perceptions of healthcare quality at hospitals measured by the revised humane caring scale. J Patient Exp 2021; 8: 23743735211065264. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211065265
  • VUJANIĆ J, MIKŠIĆ Š, BARAĆ I, VČEV A, LOVRIĆ R. Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of importance of caring nurse-patient interactions: do they differ? Healthcare 2022; 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030554
  • ZAMANZADEH V, AZIMZADEH R, RAHMANI A, VALIZADEH L. Oncology patients’ and professional nurses’ perceptions of important nurse caring behaviors. BMC Nurs 2010; 9(1): 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-9-10
  • LA ROSA-SALAS V, ARBEA MORENO L, VIDAURRETA FERNÁNDEZ M, SOLA JUANGO L, MARCOS ÁLVAREZ B, RODRÍGUEZ DÍEZ C et al. Educación interprofesional: una propuesta de la Universidad de Navarra. Educación Médica 2020; 21(6): 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.07.001
  • KJELDMAND D, HOLMSTRÖM I, ROSENQVIST U. How patient-centred am I?: A new method to measure physicians’ patient-centredness. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 62(1): 31-37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.017
  • LIRA MT, CABALLERO E. Adaptación transcultural de instrumentos de evaluación en salud: historia y reflexiones del por qué, cómo y cuándo. Rev Médica Clín Las Condes 2020; 31(1): 85-94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.08.003
  • YÁÑEZ FLORES K, RIVAS RIVEROS E, CAMPILLAY CAMPILLAY M. Ética del cuidado y cuidado de enfermería. Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados 2021; 10(1): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.22235/ech.v10i1.2124
  • POLIT DF, BECK CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29(5): 489-497. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
  • GRANT JS, DAVIS LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20(3): 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  • AGUILAR DURÁN LA, CASTELLANOS LÓPEZ MY. Adaptación lingüístico-cultural de una escala argentina de perfeccionismo infantil al contexto venezolano. REMA Rev Electron Metodol Apl 2016; 21(2): 1. http://doi.org/10.17811/rema.21.2.2016.1-32
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet