El concepto de primípara añosa

  1. Monleón Sancho, J. 1
  2. Baixauli, C. 1
  3. Minguez Milio, J. 1
  4. García Román, N. 1
  5. Plana, A. 1
  6. Monleón, J. 1
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario La Fe
    info

    Hospital Universitario La Fe

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01ar2v535

Journal:
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología

ISSN: 0304-5013

Year of publication: 2002

Volume: 45

Issue: 9

Pages: 384-390

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-5013(02)75809-3 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Our objective was to demonstrate how the concept »older primipara« does not correspond to its real meaning in current obstetrics and to argue that it should be replaced by another statistical concept independent of modification of women's delivery age. We performed a retrospective study between 1980–1999 and observed a continuous increase in »older primiparas«, reaching 7% in the final year. The population in question is more closely related to the arithmetical mean + 2 SD than to the 90th percentile. The use of 3 SD instead of 2 SD is discussed. Thus, we propose to change the concept of »older primipara«, using the values obtained with the arithmetical mean + 2 SD of the woman's age at delivery.

Bibliographic References

  • Creasy, (1987), pp. 426
  • García Hernández, (1993), pp. 127
  • Giralt, (1979), pp. 68
  • Grimes, (1981), Obstet Gynecol, 58, pp. 614
  • Hellman, (1973)
  • Kushner, (1974), Med Ann DC, 43, pp. 491
  • Rezende, (1953), Rev Ginec Obstret, 47, pp. 305
  • Rezende, (1969)
  • (1994), pp. 31
  • Stanton, (1956), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 71, pp. 270, 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)37588-3
  • Stein, (1983), Nurse Midwife, 28, pp. 17, 10.1016/0091-2182(83)90240-9
  • Gordon, (1991), Obstet Gynecol, 77, pp. 493
  • Hansen, (1966), Obstet Gynecol Surv, 41, pp. 726, 10.1097/00006254-198611000-00024
  • Kirz, (1985), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 152, pp. 7, 10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80166-6
  • Peipert, (1993), Obstet Gynecol, 81, pp. 200
  • Walters, (1950), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 59, pp. 296, 10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33166-5
  • Barkak, (1987), Am J Epidemiol, 125, pp. 101, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114491
  • Forman, (1984), Jama, 252, pp. 3135, 10.1001/jama.1984.03350220041028
  • Morrison, (1975), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 145, pp. 465, 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90076-9
  • Tuck, (1988), Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 95, pp. 230, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06862.x
  • Monleón Sancho, (2001), Toko-Gin Pract
  • Monleón Sancho, (2001), Clin Invest Gin Obstet
  • Colton, (1990)
  • Domenech i Massons, (1982)
  • Monleón, (1998)
  • Navarrete, (1998)
  • Kessler, (1980), Obstet Gynecol, 56, pp. 165
  • Blickstein, (1987), Int J Gynecol Obstet, 25, pp. 107, 10.1016/0020-7292(87)90003-8
  • Yuan, (2000), Int J Gynecol Obstet, 68, pp. 113, 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00181-2
  • Bianco, (1996), Obstet Gynecol, 87, pp. 917, 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2
  • Milner, (1992), Int J Ginecol Obstet, 38, pp. 281, 10.1016/0020-7292(92)91019-K
  • Astolfi, (1999), Hum Reprod, 14, pp. 2891, 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2891
  • Dildy, (1996), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 175, pp. 668, 10.1053/ob.1996.v175.a74402
  • Edge, (1993), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 168, pp. 1881, 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90706-O
  • Fretts, (1997), Obstet Gynecol, 89, pp. 40, 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00427-9
  • Gilbert, (1999), Obstet Gynecol, 93, pp. 9, 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00382-2
  • Poma, (2000), J Reprod Med, 45, pp. 213
  • Seideman, (1990), Int J Gynecol Obstet, 33, pp. 7, 10.1016/0020-7292(90)90647-4
  • Perelló Albero, (1996)